Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: weegee

Clearly the govt under Clinton and his administration were most culpable but the roots go back to the Carter administration.

People like Louis Freeh and even Richard Clarke have said some interesting and not very favorable things about the Clinton administration's handling of the terrorism issue. Freeh said that Clinton wasn't serious about islamic terrorism because he was chasing a right wing boogyman who didn't exist. Clarke wanted to investigate middle eastern connections to the OKC bombing but was shut down.


20 posted on 09/06/2006 6:34:27 AM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
Freeh said that Clinton wasn't serious about islamic terrorism because he was chasing a right wing boogyman who didn't exist.

Clinton ran that right wing boogyman menace issue to a successful re-election.

At its worst, he had the FBI wasting resources going after non-existent right wingers who were supposedly setting fire to minority churches. And that is in the later half of the 1990s when the terrorism is ramping up.

45 posted on 09/06/2006 8:11:51 AM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson