Well, there was the time Harris said she'd put $X million (ten, I think?) of her money into the race. Then she took it back.
And the hangar incident, where Harris blamed poor turnout for a campaign rally on the fact that the hangar where it was originally scheduled to be held had been damaged and they had to change locations. Except ... no hangar had been damaged, and they had never changed locations.
Look up the refs yourself.
2. Did Harris get the tree info from another source, or are you inferring she made the story up on the fly?
Well, there was the time Harris said she'd put $X million (ten, I think?) of her money into the race. Then she took it back.
And the hangar incident, where Harris blamed poor turnout for a campaign rally on the fact that the hangar where it was originally scheduled to be held had been damaged and they had to change locations. Except ... no hangar had been damaged, and they had never changed locations.
Those are two good ones. Then there are the many "endorsements" posted on her website which had to be removed when the persons involved denied ever endorsing her.
There is no dispute that the campaign has released inaccurate statements on several occasions. None. That means either her campaign is staffed with liars or with incompetent morons.
Neither alternative is particularly flattering to Harris, and she'll have to clean out her campaign if she wants to win the general.