Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army shuns system to combat RPGs
MSNBC.com ^ | Sept 5, 2006 | Adam Ciralsky, Lisa Myers & the NBC News Investigative Unit

Posted on 09/05/2006 6:53:40 PM PDT by ruptured duck

WASHINGTON - Rocket-propelled grenades, or RPGs, are a favorite weapon of insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are cheap, easy to use and deadly.

RPGs have killed nearly 40 Americans in Afghanistan and more than 130 in Iraq, including 21-year-old Pvt. Dennis Miller.

“They were in Ramadi, and his tank was hit with a rocket-propelled grenade,” says Miller’s mother, Kathy. “Little Denny never knew what hit him.”

Sixteen months ago, commanders in Iraq began asking the Pentagon for a new system to counter RPGs and other anti-tank weapons.

Last year, a special Pentagon unit thought it found a solution in Israel — a high-tech system that shoots RPGs out of the sky. But in a five-month exclusive investigation, NBC News has learned from Pentagon sources that that help for U.S. troops is now in serious jeopardy.

The system is called “Trophy,” and it is designed to fit on top of tanks and other armored vehicles like the Stryker now in use in Iraq.

Trophy works by scanning all directions and automatically detecting when an RPG is launched. The system then fires an interceptor — traveling hundreds of miles a minute — that destroys the RPG safely away from the vehicle.

The Israeli military, which recently lost a number of tanks and troops to RPGs, is rushing to deploy the system.

Trophy is the brainchild of Rafael, Israel’s Armament Development Authority, which has conducted more than 400 tests and found that the system has “well above [a] 90 percent” probability of killing RPGs and even more sophisticated anti-tank weapons, according to reserve Col. Didi Ben Yoash, who helped develop the system.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Technical; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: rpg; trophy; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: pfflier
Was he 6 years old when she signed him up?

You reacted to that to, huh?

The problem with Trophy is that it is basically a Claymore hooked up to a hair trigger. If we want our tanks to go through urban areas randomly blowing the Hell out of whatever moves, Trophy is a great system. If we're trying to do the job, however, Trophy would be a disaster.

21 posted on 09/05/2006 7:11:38 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

MSNBC= More Snide Nasty Bush Comments


22 posted on 09/05/2006 7:12:55 PM PDT by RacerX1128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ruptured duck

I bet it struggles with false positives in an urban environment. Firing on auto exhausts might be looked down upon.


23 posted on 09/05/2006 7:13:45 PM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

"Raytheon will promise to keep US dismounts safe from our anti=RPG weapons. The Israeli system makes no such claim, to my knowledge. This would lead us to "Spam in the can" tactics, rather than the dismount heavy approach that is used in the Stryker vehicles now."

Raytheon always promises alot, like being on time and on budget, but we know how that goes! Where are you getting the information about the dismount problem?



24 posted on 09/05/2006 7:14:01 PM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
"I think the big difference between the Israeli system available now, and the Raytheon system which might in place, is the ability to avoid hitting US dismounts around the vehicle.

WRONG!!!

The BIG difference between the Israeli System and Raytheon has ALMOST CERTAINLY (as the article points so so succinctly if you or anyone will take the time to read it) has more to do with "politics" and $$$$$ than the effectiveness of the system--which apparently has "proven" to be 98-99% successful.

That and the fact that this one is ready to go now (WHICH ALL HERE ARE CONVENIENTLY IGNORING AS I WOULD IMAGINE THAT NONE OF YOU HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE SITUATION OF OUR BRAVE TROOPS OR I WOULD NOT BE READING THIS CRAP)and Raytheon's WONT BE READY FOR ANOTHER FIVE YEARS.

This is an absolute travesty and bullsh*t.

25 posted on 09/05/2006 7:14:27 PM PDT by seasoned traditionalist (ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS, BUT ALL TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY, ARE MUSLIMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
It sounds like a great way to tear up dismounted infantry around the armored vehicle.

BINGO - GIVE THE MAN A SEEEGAHHH!

P.S. It is not just our nearby troops who get torn up...

26 posted on 09/05/2006 7:14:35 PM PDT by nevergiveup (Locals say "puh-TUCK-it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bybybill

The current projects combine GPS systems with active, low power, high bandwidth transmitters so you know where people are all the time.

The Raytheon system will doubtless integrate with that to prevent many friendly fire incidents. The Israeli system, though good for what it does, may not do that.

One wonders if Raytheon has a hard on about Raphael, or vice versa. It would be easier to take a working system and latch an inhibiter into it than to build a new system.

Of course with a US company you get US ITAR restrictions. Amazingly restrictive, even unconstitutionally so.


27 posted on 09/05/2006 7:15:27 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

You win the prize. The only way to win a war is to make the other side beg for it to be over. War is the last stage of diplomacy, not a part of it. When we have to wage war, then let loose the dogs of war and don't stop them until the deed is done.


28 posted on 09/05/2006 7:17:10 PM PDT by coon2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
What happened to the airbag system? That one did a soft catch of the RPG, too little impact to trigger the fuse...
29 posted on 09/05/2006 7:17:47 PM PDT by null and void (Islamic communities belong in Islamic countries.- Eric in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: seasoned traditionalist

Buying the MSNBC line hook/line/sinker, are we, Newbie?


30 posted on 09/05/2006 7:19:33 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: seasoned traditionalist
Don't you think you might want to find another source to confirm these "facts" before you jump to your conclusion? News outlets have been proven to be pushing an agenda on more than one occasion.
31 posted on 09/05/2006 7:19:34 PM PDT by ruptured duck (He shoots....and boom goes the dynamite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ruptured duck
I heard $200K in an Israeli article.

Typical NBC News BullSheet....of course NBC was never in a rush to spend the "Peace Dividend" and leave soldiers unprotected...

32 posted on 09/05/2006 7:20:13 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ruptured duck

The best countermeasure against RPGs is the gunners in a patrol watching their sector and pouring automatic weapons fire at the jihadi preparing to fire the RPG.


33 posted on 09/05/2006 7:20:40 PM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
The article says the Israeli system works 98 percent of the time and is available now rather cheap...The Army balked because they have a $70 million contract with Raytheon to develop a system. This is a no brainer...buy the Israeli system now.

ABSOLUTELY!!

I'm just a little put out by what I'm reading from so many "EXPERTS" here about this subject.

NO, I'm NOT an expert, but I did spend 18 months in Nam, which does give me a little insight on being on the receiving end of enemy fire and IF this works and IF it can save ONE life NOW as opposed to worrying that MAYBE (AND THIS REALLY PISSES ME OFF, READING THIS CRAP) "INJURING SOMEONE INOCENTLY WHEN DISCHARGING THIS WEAPON" and WAITING ANOTHER FIVE YEAR?

Jesus H. Christ, what is a matter with all of you??????

34 posted on 09/05/2006 7:21:34 PM PDT by seasoned traditionalist (ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS, BUT ALL TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY, ARE MUSLIMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: seasoned traditionalist

Until you can show us the specs of both systems, it's your opinion that politics and BullSheet...


35 posted on 09/05/2006 7:22:43 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ruptured duck
Don't you think you might want to find another source to confirm these "facts" before you jump to your conclusion? News outlets have been proven to be pushing an agenda on more than one occasion.

Which I might add, is why i posted the article in the first place. To learn more about the system before I reached a conclusion for myself.
36 posted on 09/05/2006 7:22:59 PM PDT by ruptured duck (He shoots....and boom goes the dynamite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: seasoned traditionalist

So, Mr. Experience, how does this wonder of technology work?


37 posted on 09/05/2006 7:23:03 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ArtyFO
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Israeli_RPG_Defense_System_Passes_Live_Fire_Test.html

My guess the decision not to buy is a political one. The US Military on Arab soil with a weapon purchased in Israel.

I wonder what version of RPG it is design to protect against.

The Israelis used to run current through barbed wire to prematurely set of the explosives on fortified positions.
38 posted on 09/05/2006 7:23:16 PM PDT by Perdogg (My friends say I should act my age - What's my age again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seasoned traditionalist

I submit there may be more than one difference.

The military procurement system is imperfect, but they are driven by requirements. The requirements come from field commanders. The procurement bureaucrats put out contracts to seek systems that meet these requirements.

There is some give and take with contractors too, but not very much. The procurement bureaucrats are, if anything, suspicious of contractors, for all the right reasons.

I have only been working military procurement things since 1983, with 4 years in the Infantry before that.

Reasonable people may disagree about how much weight should be given to different requirements, vs. other requirements. I give you my strongest assurance that "industrial policy" has very little to do with the decisions made by me, or decisions made by anyone I worked with.

It happens. There is a former AF officer in jail just now who was influenced by Boeing. The penalties for that kind of stuff are appropriately stiff, and the paper trail is so volumnious that you can't hide decisions made for the wrong reasons.


39 posted on 09/05/2006 7:23:19 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ruptured duck

Don't be so hard on yourself, RD...


40 posted on 09/05/2006 7:24:14 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson