To: Paul Ross
Since they are running the Canal, they may not actually "pay" to do the widening. Perhaps they will simply charge increased fees to transit to pay its way. And use their slave labor to do it...putting a couple more hundred thousand of their forces on the isthmus...You provide an excellent example of a hysterical rant so typical of these types of threads.
Hutchinson Ports is the port operator. They don't operate the canal. Panama operates the Canal. And the Chinese have not brought over several hundred thousand slave laborers to run their operations. The employees are Panamanians. Nor have they brought over any military.
None of those facts are important when you've got a good rant going, though.
51 posted on
09/05/2006 2:39:54 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
None of those facts are important when you've got a good rant going, though. LOL! Paul knows as much about the Canal as he does about the Federal Reserve.
52 posted on
09/05/2006 2:48:30 PM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math and reading?)
To: Dog Gone
Yours is the hysterical rant. Their control is indirect, but real,
Is China In Control of the Panama Canal? and your further rant,
And the Chinese have not brought over several hundred thousand slave laborers to run their operationsI didn't say they had. Yet.
The employees are Panamanians. Nor have they brought over any military.
Oh, yeah, written in stone I'm sure.
54 posted on
09/05/2006 3:00:36 PM PDT by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Dog Gone
Why would the Chinese bring troops into Panama when they're already in Mexico? This
thread is from 2003. Corsi should get good mileage out of this . . . .
56 posted on
09/05/2006 3:06:57 PM PDT by
1rudeboy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson