Skip to comments.
Wider Panama Canal Would Aid Chinese
Human Events Online ^
| Sep 05, 2006
| Jerome Corsi
Posted on 09/05/2006 1:19:23 PM PDT by Trupolitik
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: Comstock1
Many of the european shipping lines are building them too.
41
posted on
09/05/2006 2:13:54 PM PDT
by
allen08gop
("Woman is the most powerful magnet in the universe... and all men are cheap metal!")
To: chilepepper
42
posted on
09/05/2006 2:14:22 PM PDT
by
allen08gop
("Woman is the most powerful magnet in the universe... and all men are cheap metal!")
To: Trupolitik
As we have noted previously, port operations at both ends of the Panama Canal are already being operated by the Communist Chinese company Hutchinson Ports. Thank You Jimmy "Craphead" Carter!
43
posted on
09/05/2006 2:15:10 PM PDT
by
tophat9000
(If it was illegal French Canadians would La Raza back them? Racist back their race over country)
To: Trupolitik
I don't have any problem with the Chinese modifying the canal. Let the Chinese pay to widen the canal. It'll benefit all of us, and it increases their dependence on the west.
Of course the "slave labor" is another issue, but you can make that argument about everything the Chinese do. It really comes down to how you define "slave labor." If you want to construe it strictly, then everyone in China is a slave.
To: Trupolitik
I just knew from the title that this pile of steaming crap was written by Jerome Corsi.
The kook sees a conspiracy behind everything.
45
posted on
09/05/2006 2:17:52 PM PDT
by
COEXERJ145
(Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
To: Brilliant
In general I belive protectionists believe anyone anywhere that sells a product for less than someone else is committing the crime of theft.
To: Trupolitik
There's no way a wider Panama Canal would be a bad thing. Corsi doesn't like trade with China, but he doesn't really like much of anything.
I'm waiting for the follow-up rant against the Canal from his evil twin sister, Phyllis Schlafly.
47
posted on
09/05/2006 2:24:05 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Brilliant
Since they are running the Canal, they may not actually "pay" to do the widening. Perhaps they will simply charge increased fees to transit to pay its way. And use their slave labor to do it...putting a couple more hundred thousand of their forces on the isthmus...
48
posted on
09/05/2006 2:25:28 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Trupolitik
This China-Mexico-USA-WalMart sh!t only gets worse and worse and stupider. These are very big plans along with NAFTA superhighways. My bet is the USD crashes before this infrastructure is built out and we don't have the money to buy all this China crap.
49
posted on
09/05/2006 2:29:49 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
To: Paul Ross
I heard WalMart will pay to widen the canal and it's going to be renamed Sam's Canal Club
50
posted on
09/05/2006 2:32:28 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
To: Paul Ross
Since they are running the Canal, they may not actually "pay" to do the widening. Perhaps they will simply charge increased fees to transit to pay its way. And use their slave labor to do it...putting a couple more hundred thousand of their forces on the isthmus...You provide an excellent example of a hysterical rant so typical of these types of threads.
Hutchinson Ports is the port operator. They don't operate the canal. Panama operates the Canal. And the Chinese have not brought over several hundred thousand slave laborers to run their operations. The employees are Panamanians. Nor have they brought over any military.
None of those facts are important when you've got a good rant going, though.
51
posted on
09/05/2006 2:39:54 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
None of those facts are important when you've got a good rant going, though. LOL! Paul knows as much about the Canal as he does about the Federal Reserve.
52
posted on
09/05/2006 2:48:30 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math and reading?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
It's very common for those who have the strongest opinions to be among the least informed.
53
posted on
09/05/2006 2:54:58 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
Yours is the hysterical rant. Their control is indirect, but real,
Is China In Control of the Panama Canal? and your further rant,
And the Chinese have not brought over several hundred thousand slave laborers to run their operationsI didn't say they had. Yet.
The employees are Panamanians. Nor have they brought over any military.
Oh, yeah, written in stone I'm sure.
54
posted on
09/05/2006 3:00:36 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Dog Gone
It's very common for those who have the strongest opinions to be among the least informed. Pot, meet kettle.
55
posted on
09/05/2006 3:01:36 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Dog Gone
Why would the Chinese bring troops into Panama when they're already in Mexico? This
thread is from 2003. Corsi should get good mileage out of this . . . .
56
posted on
09/05/2006 3:06:57 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Dog Gone
Just wait. One day the Chinese
will bring in the military. One day the Chinese
will bring in several hundred thousand slave laborers and then Paul will be able to say he was right all along.
You'll be sorry. You'll ALL be sorry. LOL!
57
posted on
09/05/2006 3:07:13 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math and reading?)
To: Paul Ross
Yes you did.
putting a couple more hundred thousand of their forces on the isthmus...
What does the word "more" mean to you?
The fact is that you're wrong. Soaking up John Birch propaganda is a good way to ensure that you'll continue to be wrong.
58
posted on
09/05/2006 3:11:48 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
More means more than they already had.
59
posted on
09/05/2006 3:23:57 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: 1rudeboy
What happened to the several hundred thousand Chinese troops in the Bahamas? That was a favorite theme of the nutbag crowd for several months.
60
posted on
09/05/2006 3:24:21 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson