That's arguable, but let's skip it. Who says drug possession must pose a threat to others before it can be regulated? Not our constitution, that's for sure.
As a matter of fact, you can't name one society or one government throughout history that limited their laws only to behavior that posed a threat to others.
So, where did you get your "threat" standard? Just making it up?
That's arguable, but let's skip it... Not our constitution, that's for sure.
That's arguable, but let's skip it. ;-)
As a matter of fact, you can't name one society or one government throughout history that limited their laws only to behavior that posed a threat to others.
I can give a long list of firsts that laws, business practices, scientific utilizations and societal changes have progressed from the non-existence of to existence of. Your argument or point or whatever your intention was is irrelevant. No surprise there.
So, where did you get your "threat" standard? Just making it up?
Reason, logic and Thomas Jefferson. But you already know that as I have explained it to you before.
Thomas Jefferson wasn't perfect -- nobody is. But he was spot on target with this: "No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him." --Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816.
Marijuana is a chemical warfare agent... it FEMINIZES men...
And since the 1960's, this is what the cultural Marxists are after...