Of course, merely mentioning the names of Savage or Farah will bring on the usual gang of RINOs and pseudo-conservatives who regard them as dangerous extremists. Seldom do they express a similar dislike of the liberal spew from the MSM.
Spinning an image is more important and using the mainstream
media to do it is more important.
They send out Condi and Cheyney to keep conservatives happy on Sean or Rush.
And of course they ignore guys like Savage who would really ask the tough questions about any inconsistencies in policy.
Rush once had a conversation on air with former GOP Chairman Ed Gillespie asking why govrernment wasn't going to be shrunk. Gillespie said "that isn't going to happen."
Rush moved onto something else.
As for Katie she isn't she isn't going to last long. The use of different opinions was tried by CNN at the beginning.
They didn't last either.
There is a barrier created by the MSM. The elite politicians and the every day middle class American Joes (like me) are not well connected. Those at the top are trying to see through a fog of what the pulse of the people is. Unfortunately, they look through binoculars issued by a liberal media. Many get an out of phase understanding of what we elected them for.
The biggest problem with the MSM? They no longer recognize right from wrong. They do not acknowledge good and evil. They refuse to put anything in real context beyond how news affects opnion polls and elections. A good reporter would not only give all sides to a story, they would put world issues in historical perspectives. Here is an example of a simple issue that the new media would report that the MSM would not:
The economy is doing well. Tax cuts must be given the largest credit for its progress. Historically, each time the government has lowered taxes, the economy exceeds growth expectations. Fill in details of the economy here past and present.