Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

G.O.P. Sets Aside Work on Immigration
New York Times via Drudge Report ^ | Sept 4, 2006 | CARL HULSE and RACHEL L. SWARNS

Posted on 09/04/2006 5:48:05 PM PDT by RobFromGa

Edited on 09/05/2006 1:53:36 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON, Sept. 4 — As they prepare for a critical pre-election legislative stretch, Congressional Republican leaders have all but abandoned a broad overhaul of immigration laws and instead will concentrate on national security issues they believe play to their political strength.

With Congress reconvening Tuesday after an August break, Republicans in the House and Senate say they will focus on Pentagon and domestic security spending bills, port security legislation and measures that would authorize the administration’s terror surveillance program and create military tribunals to try terror suspects.

“We Republicans believe that we have no choice in the war against terror and the only way to do it is to continue to take them head-on whether it is in Iraq or elsewhere,” said Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the majority leader.

Excerpted


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006election; aliens; amensty; borders; buyintothehysteria; congress; election2006; elections; gwot; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; iseekeywordracist; kneejerk; panicmode; skyisfalling; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-326 last
To: mjaneangels@aolcom
How are they to govern with 3 branches now, when they only have some control of 2 branches (The Executive branch, and the Legislative branch)?

Republicans have appointed 7 of the 9 Supreme Court justices.

321 posted on 09/05/2006 8:59:27 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom
First of all, why should the House come up with a new bill? What is it about the current bill they passed that you do not like?

It wasn't bad and was far superior to the open border, amnesty-lite bill the senate passed.

It was too broad though. It just needs to cover building border length wall (definite construction timetable) and requiring the criminal prosecution of employers of illegals.

When a bill gets too broad then it is easy to demonize and mischaracterize. There is no way the senate nor the president could reject such a bill without destroying all of what credibility they have left.

322 posted on 09/05/2006 9:07:54 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Do you even read my posts? I've stated numerous times that the dems are bad news and will investigate the hell out of Bush and even fabricate something if they have to.

Not protecting our borders, while having a war on terror, borders on treason already. They won't have to fabricate anything. He took an oath to protect the citizens of the US and our borders.

323 posted on 09/06/2006 3:20:37 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama
Instead of kicking the criminals out, they're salivating over how many potential voters they are importing.

We live in an area with a lot of hispanics, and I don't know of any that vote republican.

324 posted on 09/06/2006 9:12:40 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
We live in an area with a lot of hispanics, and I don't know of any that vote republican.

Of course they don't - the only large block of republican voting hispanics are the cubans in SE Florida.

Now hispanics do tend to vote for Bush a bit, especially in Texas, but that is because he promises and delivers to them an open border. If that is the only way to get their vote then it is good for the country or the party longterm?

It cracks me up when party loyalists try to advocate the Mexicans will vote conservative do to family values and an anti-abortion stance. lol

325 posted on 09/06/2006 11:18:19 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
It cracks me up when party loyalists try to advocate the Mexicans will vote conservative do to family values and an anti-abortion stance. lol

Exactly. The ones we know are catholic, but they despise President Bush.

326 posted on 09/06/2006 2:59:44 PM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-326 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson