Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: omega4179
There is no way that a building even the towers 1 and 2 could survive not only the air craft hitting it but 24,000 gallons of JP4 burning including all the files and paper in those offices as well as furniture rugs and the partitions. The fire must have been so intense after the impact buckles many supporting columns that it is a wonder that the buildings lasted as long as they did. Structural failure from the heat was the ultimate reason for the buildings pancaking on themselves.
As far as building 7 is concerned. It could not withstand the weight of debris from the towers.
To believe otherwise the person must have mental deficits.
40 posted on 09/03/2006 6:36:03 PM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Doc91678

wtc.nist has the facts and is an exhaustive report that doesn't deal in hyperbole and wishes.
I recommend it to everyone for reading and understanding the impact, the fuel factor, how much fuel burned outside the building, the path of the fires after the impact.


44 posted on 09/03/2006 6:39:41 PM PDT by WoodstockCat (General Honore: "The storm gets a vote... We're not stuck on stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Doc91678

There are people who are highly mentally defective who believe that the 9/11 attacks either didn't really happen or else the attacks were the result of some "Zionist" conspiracy. These people remind me of the idiots who say the Holocaust never happened. This type of thinking is becoming respectable in one of the major American political parties -- this is very dangerous.


62 posted on 09/03/2006 7:06:33 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson