Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
It's not true to alchemists and assorted ideolgical moonbats. In science, it is a statement of fact. Embryo's are capable of living which is the defintition of viable. The defintition of viable is NOT 'will live'. The science is clear, real science that is.

Is that why so few scientists are opposed to IVF and to destroying fertilized embryos?

jas3
368 posted on 09/05/2006 7:22:11 AM PDT by jas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies ]


To: jas3
Is that why so few scientists are opposed to IVF and to destroying fertilized embryos?

Not really. One can take an honest position, acknowledge that embryo's are nascent human life and still advocate killing them for utilitarian purposes. I don't agree with that postition morally but at least it is a scientifically honest one. The crap you and the other clown are selling is simply dishonest bs.

You see the difference?

373 posted on 09/05/2006 7:34:26 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson