Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: orionblamblam

I'm not talking about some ridiculous argument of being put in a human hostile environment. No adult would be able to survive those conditions, either. A two month old in any earthly environment would not survive long on it's own. In that respect it simply is not viable. And what's a *prefectly normal environment*? The desert? The arctic? The jungle? They're all *normal* environments at different places on the earth. And how many adults could survive long in those places on thier ow, either? The argument of the baby's being to *survive on its own* is a pretty weak one.


174 posted on 09/03/2006 7:58:26 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

Not only pretty weak, totally eviscerated. It's an already dead argument.

If you take any fully grown human and put them on a desert island with no coconut trees and no spring water, they'd all die too. So I guess none of us deserve to live.


178 posted on 09/03/2006 8:18:32 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

> I'm not talking about some ridiculous argument of being put in a human hostile environment.

Yes, you are. Hello? Test tube? Not capable of supporting the development of an embryo.

> The argument of the baby's being to *survive on its own* is a pretty weak one.

We're not talking about a *baby*. We're talking about less than a dozen cells.


200 posted on 09/04/2006 7:25:19 AM PDT by orionblamblam (I'm interested in science and preventing its corruption, so here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson