Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jas3
Would either a). testing of naturally occurring eggs and sperm or b). engineering eggs and sperm prior to fertilisation be morally acceptable to those of you who oppose the destruction of embryos?

For many of us, the problem is not just with the screen-and-discard process. It's with the whole process that separates conception from natural human relations--with IVF itself. This is what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says about IVF involving sperm and egg from the biological parents themselves:

2377 Techniques involving only the married couple (homologous artificial insemination and fertilization) are perhaps less reprehensible [than those involving donor sperm and/or egg], yet remain morally unacceptable. They dissociate the sexual act from the procreative act. The act which brings the child into existence is no longer an act by which two persons give themselves to one another, but one that "entrusts the life and identity of the embryo into the power of doctors and biologists and establishes the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of the human person. Such a relationship of domination is in itself contrary to the dignity and equality that must be common to parents and children." "Under the moral aspect procreation is deprived of its proper perfection when it is not willed as the fruit of the conjugal act, that is to say, of the specific act of the spouses' union . . . . Only respect for the link between the meanings of the conjugal act and respect for the unity of the human being make possible procreation in conformity with the dignity of the person."
Obviously, this is a minority view even now - and will become more so as people increasingly reject the notion of giving birth to "defective" children. But I think most people know that there is something amiss with the mindset behind test-tube baby-making. That's probably why so many of them are anxious to find a good rationale for destroying the unwanted embryos stored in fertility clinics.
112 posted on 09/03/2006 5:32:11 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: madprof98

Yeah...but the guys who wrote that Catechism thing have no real training in bioethics, and no source documents from which to draw on, i.e. there's nothing in the Bible about IVF or embryos.

Why is the opinion of the Catholic Church anything more than just opinion that Catholics should accept for themselves, but not try to impose upon Jews or Protestants?

jas3


120 posted on 09/03/2006 5:56:24 PM PDT by jas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson