[meandog]

You read this piece, thought it was liberal kookery, read Fred's bio, decided the piece was common sense. Is that what you're saying?

NO...I thought it was kookery from some of the strident adjectives used to describe the president...but the article makes perfect sense to me. Bush has failed to delineate his plans for winning the WOT and has caused a great deal of the frustration felt by the country...Rick Santorium as much as said the same thing today in his senate debate on MTP.

[dirtboy]

Bush has failed to delineate his plans for winning the WOT

Dog, you're absurd. The only issue I have with Bush regarding the WOT is that he hasn't properly labelled it as a war on Islamists. Other than that, he has done a pretty decent job, considering he has had to deal continually with opposition to the war that has emboldened the enemy. Bush is not just fighting al Qaeda - he is also fighting the ghosts of Vietnam that still plague our country - where a bunch of liberal asswipes turned military victory into political defeat. The same is happening here - and as long as the Dems continue to demand we pull a Vietnam in Iraq, our opponents will keep fighting - not in expectation of defeating us in Iraq, but of having our own friggin liberal idiots defeat us at home.

[macamadamia]

Then you might be real surprised when their gratitude was exiguous after you remorselessly wrecked their cities, killed their army (which consisted of other people's husbands, brothers, and sons: Ever think of that?), groped their women when you didn't have time to rape them, and left them without water and electricity.



So our military is going around groping Iraqi women with the intent of raping? Is that the "perfect sense" you are refering to?