Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eight billion mysteries stump the little man in the big White House
Free-Lance Star ^ | 9.2.06 | Fred Reed

Posted on 09/03/2006 10:03:43 AM PDT by meandog

GUADALAJARA--I'm wondering. Help me wonder. Either Georgie Bush is the minor, depressing, witless ferret I think he is, or I am. It has to be one or the other. If things don't start looking up pretty soon internationally, I'm going to be pretty sure which.

As best as I can tell, what the Maximum Cipher lacks, among an inexhaustible list of other things, is a hop toad's understanding of how people work. Here we have the explanation of just about everything he does. He's dealing with a world full of people, but has no idea what people are. He probably couldn't recognize one. So he doesn't take their predictable behavior into account.

Think about it. When he went braying into Iraq, he thought people would roll over, throw flowers, and have a democratic revolution. This would start a domino effect that would make all the other Muslim countries want to be democracies, too. They would climb over each other to be democracies. They would love us because democracies love each other. He just knew it.

This makes perfect sense if you have no flipping idea how human beings work.

(Excerpt) Read more at fredericksburg.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: assclown; asspacker; bravosierra; bush; drunkhack; fredreed; fredthewitlessferret; freedred; friedreed; homosexualagenda; iraq; moron; mrnoname; tacticalnukestrikes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-228 next last
To: Steel Wolf

A little bit of freedom is a dangerous thing. Especially when you try to stuff the cork back in the bottle after you have opened it.


41 posted on 09/03/2006 10:25:07 AM PDT by listenhillary (Only the stupidest of animals fouls it's own nest - Democrats provide a fine example of this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: meandog

The world population has not yet reached 8 billion.


42 posted on 09/03/2006 10:25:08 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands
The point of the article, IMHO, is that the Arab world cares a fig about democracy... The Arab world is a culture all to its own and loyalties surround tribes, and clans and caliphs, and, now god fobid, mullahs and imans--nothing more. Just look at the anachronistic Saudis, my god they still have kings and princes.
It was altogether altruistic for Bush to think that we could present a better way to such a backward people.
43 posted on 09/03/2006 10:25:10 AM PDT by meandog (While Clinton isn't fit even to scrape Reagan's shoes, Bush will never fill them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Actually, the President laid out the agenda for Iraq long ago, but those trying there damnedest to get the democraps back into power keep pretending that he didn't. I'm surprised you don't already know this, dog.

The President has made it abundantly clear that establishing a self-governing democracy in Iraq is our goal, and to do that we must pacify and educate scores of Iraqi politicians and policing personnel. THAT job is exactly what our courageous military is about right now in Iraq. They need most of all that we let them know we support their efforts, rather than sending them the defeatest messaage the democrap party is depending upon to empower them in the 2006 elections.

Don't help the democrats defeat our resolve by pretending the Presidnet and his Sect. Of Defense haven't conveyed their strategy in Iraq. The democrats have a strategy for Iraq, also: cut and run for cover and hope that the world of murdering Islamist don't notice and become even more emboldened by our running away in democrat triumph, leaving the Iraqi people do suffer the murderous Iranian plan for Iraq.

44 posted on 09/03/2006 10:25:24 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bboop

Agreed :)


45 posted on 09/03/2006 10:26:33 AM PDT by mosquewatch.com (No Islam, Know peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
He claims to understand history. How is it that a country that we dropped two atomic bombs on can be one of our greatest allies?

An interesting point. Care to explain why Japan is our friend, whereas Iraq is not?

The answer does have to do with force, by the way.

46 posted on 09/03/2006 10:26:55 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (- Islam will never survive being laughed at. -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: meandog
As we speak, the Israelis have pretty much destroyed Lebanon. Bush kept the U.N. from doing anything to interfere, and sent advanced bombs to the Israelis so they could blow up anything that's left.

So Pat Buchanan has taken a pen name and moved to Mexico.

47 posted on 09/03/2006 10:27:15 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Think about it. When he went braying into Iraq, he thought people would roll over, throw flowers, and have a democratic revolution. This would start a domino effect that would make all the other Muslim countries want to be democracies, too. They would climb over each other to be democracies. They would love us because democracies love each other. He just knew it.

This makes perfect sense if you have no flipping idea how human beings work.


With one correction: this makes perfect sense if you have no flipping idea how Islam works. Then again, Bush does call it a religion of peace.
48 posted on 09/03/2006 10:27:34 AM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Where is the barf alert?


49 posted on 09/03/2006 10:27:50 AM PDT by Kaslin (No matter what the left says. G.W. Bush will be remembered as the best president of this century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
We firebombed the crap out of Germany. We dropped nukes on Japan. I imagine that galled the Germans and the Japanese but the evidence is in there, killing them in great numbers and occupying their countries resulted in two stable democracies with one being a pretty good ally of those who did the killing and galling.

Another WWII reference. Do you see the main difference between our defeat of the Axis powers and our defeat of Iraq, the respective occupations, and the post war results?

50 posted on 09/03/2006 10:28:35 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (- Islam will never survive being laughed at. -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: meandog

"Saudis, my god they still have kings and princes."

mmm England?


51 posted on 09/03/2006 10:28:35 AM PDT by listenhillary (Only the stupidest of animals fouls it's own nest - Democrats provide a fine example of this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
A little bit of freedom is a dangerous thing. Especially when you try to stuff the cork back in the bottle after you have opened it.

I do agree there. Freedom is very dangerous to people who neither understand nor care about consequences.

52 posted on 09/03/2006 10:29:48 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (- Islam will never survive being laughed at. -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: meandog
NR Goes to War

AND SO WE CAME TO 9/11. On that unforgettable Tuesday morning, a series of ugly events occurred. Unspeakable death and destruction that produced terror and fear and, soon thereafter, the birth of a pernicious cliche. It was said and then repeated and then echoed and then chanted that "9/11 changed everything." Never underestimate the power of clichE to sweep all argument before it. In Washington at least, 9/11 did seem to change everything. Less than a year earlier, George Bush had been elected President on a foreign policy platform with three planks: (1) that the U.S. would not act as the world's policeman; (2) that the U.S. would be humble before the nations of the world; and (3) that the U.S. would not engage in nation-building. Taken together, these three planks added up to a conventionally conservative approach, a platform that had been roundly endorsed by NR. Now, with a 180-degree whiplash, the Bush administration began to rumble about "regime change" and "going it alone," and "building a democratic Iraq." Call this 9/12 approach whatever you will -- utopian, neoconservative, Wilsonian -- it could not fairly be characterized as "conservative."

53 posted on 09/03/2006 10:30:13 AM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
The only issue I have with Bush regarding the WOT is that he hasn't properly labelled it as a war on Islamists.

Well, that's where I also stand...but I just do not believe that he's got the sand to completely commit to fighting a war on ALL Islamists (Iran, currently the chief culprit but Syria and, probably one day, Saudi Arabia, Yeman, Jordan, and even Egypt included). I've seen inconsistencies already and I was burned by his "Read My Lips" old man and have concluded that coitus interruptus, in the case of the GWOT, is in his DNA!

54 posted on 09/03/2006 10:30:15 AM PDT by meandog (While Clinton isn't fit even to scrape Reagan's shoes, Bush will never fill them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Of course, if you have read any history, which Bush hasn't, you will have noticed that people do not like being occupied by force. They don't like having their cities bombed. It galls them. It can, under certain circumstances (such as any circumstances) make them hostile.

Kinda like Japan, Huh?
Ya learn something new around here everyday.

55 posted on 09/03/2006 10:30:53 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Saying we should never have went into Iraq because the people don't like force is just silly because Saddam was a force that killed thousands of their people and the people didn't lift a finger against him.

There's a lot of Shi'ite and Kurdish mass graves who's residents would beg to differ with you on that count.

56 posted on 09/03/2006 10:31:41 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (- Islam will never survive being laughed at. -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Stripped of the inflammatory (and unnecessary) rhetoric, what he's saying is simply the old adage: You can't help people who don't want to help themselves.


57 posted on 09/03/2006 10:31:53 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
Pretty much because Qadaffi decided he could be richer and more stable as a sell out.

Last I checked, historically Libya was a major state sponsor of terrorism until the Iraq invasion. Better Qadaffi makes a few extra bucks exporting more oil instead.

...and right into Iranian influence. Vote Hizbullah, vote often.

Wrong. That influence was there all along via Syria. Hiz got only 20 percent of the vote - they are influential only because of their outside sponsors.

Oh, and regarding Saudi Arabia and Kuwait - they are also protected by their oil wealth. The best way to reduce that protection is to add more oil production. Once Iraq is stabilized, they will be in a position to compete with the Saudis for production capacity. That way, the next time the Saudis threaten to cut off the flow of their oil in response to political pressure, we can tell them to go ahead and do it - and see what happens.

58 posted on 09/03/2006 10:31:56 AM PDT by dirtboy (This tagline has been photoshopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Wait until the Bush-bots get a load of this piece!

"Bush-bots" have learned to recognize a smart arse piece by a glib wannabe Jonnie Dollar and move on. As one poster suggested, this man most likely has an agenda; I believe that to be more than just a possibility……..

59 posted on 09/03/2006 10:31:59 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Thanks for your post - saved me typing time. Have a good Sunday!


60 posted on 09/03/2006 10:32:09 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-228 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson