EU members want more openness from Solana on Iran

EUOBSERVER / LAPPEENRANTA - A number of EU member states are growing impatient with the secretive handling of the Iran issue by foreign policy chief Javier Solana and the EU's "big three," with most foreign ministers not having seen a key Iranian paper at a meeting in Finland.

The Iran nuclear dispute dominated the second day of an EU foreign ministers meeting in Finland on Saturday (2 September) and saw ministers agree to mandate Mr Solana to seek further "clarifications" from Tehran despite its failure to meet Thursday's UN deadline to suspend uranium enrichment.

But 22 out of the 25 ministers were not allowed to see a "top secret" 21-page report which Tehran produced last week explaining its position – a document only seen by Mr Solana and the so-called EU-3 countries the UK, France and Germany.

The EU-3 and Mr Solana handle the thorny Iranian nuclear file on behalf of the bloc's 25 member states, with Tehran requesting maximum confidentiality.

The "big three plus Solana" construction used by the EU in the Iran dispute is seen by many experts and diplomats as having produced a rare success story for EU foreign policy.

Not only has the EU so far largely spoken with one voice on Iran – as opposed to for example on the Middle East – but the bloc has also taken up a leading international role on the issue, with UN veto powers, the US, Russia and China, allowing Mr Solana to talk to Tehran on their behalf.

Unity has a price But the EU's unity and assertiveness on Iran has a price it emerged over this Finnish meeting.

Dutch foreign minister Bernard Bot said that "a couple of countries" - including the Netherlands – have demanded to know what is in the Iranian document before 15 September, when foreign ministers meet in formal session to discuss Iran.

"You can only make decisions when you know what you should take decisions on," he said.

"We have said that when we want to decide, we should know what is in the document."

"There is an answer from Iran, but only the EU 3 and Solana know that answer," said Mr Bot adding however that he had "full confidence" in Mr Solana.

Italian foreign minister Massimo D'Alema said, without complaining about the matter directly, "We don't have the Iranian document. It is confidential, so in a certain way this mandate [to Mr Solana] is based on good faith. He has the document, [member states] don't have it."

Italy, Iran's biggest trading partner in the EU, is said to be one of the member states that is uneasy with the way it is being kept out of the talks.

"Several member states want a fuller briefing on Iran," said one source close to the EU-Iran talks adding that the "big three" are being perceived by some capitals as a "quasi directorate" in EU foreign policy.

Little appetite for sanctions The fresh mandate that Mr Solana received on Saturday consists of holding face-to-face talks with Tehran's top nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani at the beginning of next week - also on behalf of the US, China and Russia.

The EU's top diplomat will seek clarifications on the secret Iranian document which is "long, repetitive, and sometimes contradictory," according to one EU diplomat.

Only after the Solana-Larijani talks will the UN veto powers consider sanctions against Iran, but most EU ministers at the meeting showed little appetite for the idea.

Spain's foreign minister Miguel Angel Moratinos stated "for the moment we should keep talking."

Germany's Frank-Walter Steinmeier stressed that "the most important thing is that the international community does not let itself be divided," with Russia and China disliking the sanctions option.

Danish foreign minister Per Stig Moller however appeared to take a harder line saying that if Iran continues to be defiant, "we should impose sanctions."

International powers suspect that with Iran's uranium enrichment scheme is aimed at developing nuclear weapons, something which Tehran has denied.

Iran knows how to divide and conquer.

2 posted on 09/02/2006 7:04:38 PM PDT by Hound of the Baskervilles (A)

"We have said that when we want to decide, we should know what is in the document."

Spoken like a true Euroweenie

3 posted on 09/02/2006 7:05:19 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude ()..Hey Libs....NO FITZMAS FOR YOU....()

From article

Not only has the EU so far largely spoken with ONE VOICE on Iran – as opposed to for example on the Middle East – but the bloc has also taken up a LEADING international role on the issue, with UN veto powers, ==>> the US, Russia and China, ALLOWING Mr Solana to talk to Tehran on their behalf. <<==

4 posted on 09/02/2006 7:23:22 PM PDT by Esther Ruth (Behold, he that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep. The LORD is thy keeper!)

Why does US have to be represented by EU?

5 posted on 09/02/2006 7:56:56 PM PDT by paudio (Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)

I'd sacrifice openness for competence and action. Never seems the EU members are too upset when nothing ever gets done by the UN or its EU member states.

6 posted on 09/02/2006 9:38:12 PM PDT by bpjam (Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)

7 posted on 09/02/2006 10:15:51 PM PDT by Hound of the Baskervilles (A)

"Why does US have to be represented by EU?"

Maybe because we don't have direct talks with Iran. We only talk to Iran through a Swedish delegation. And I presume we are showing ourselves to be co-operative with the other nations and their efforts and concerns.

8 posted on 09/02/2006 10:21:36 PM PDT by Hound of the Baskervilles (A)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.