Nice rant, but it failed to address the point that the original author was making stuff up.
their miserable, worthless spewings are not worth debating
You're unable to either admit your error or provide evidence then. Ok.
I wasn't aware that 'blustering ignorance' was supposed to be a conservative 'value' -- usually I associate it with Dims, in fact. That's one of the reasons I actually learned something about Marxism - 'know your enemy' is more my style than your 'wallow in righteous ignorance' approach.
To each his own, however. You and the original author seem about the same mindset (frothing, hissing and spitting-wise) at least.
--R. 'lack of concern for accuracy, too'
R...Nice rant, but it failed to address the point that the original author was making stuff up.
Essentially, you are using the scribblings of a disconnected-from-reality madman as the basis for your accusations against the author. In essence, you are holding up a comic book as a source of truth and reality and accusing the author thereon of, "making stuff up."
Should no one take you seriously in this forum RustM, just look in the mirror for the reason why. Then ask yourself who Lenin was really referring to when he contemptuously spoke of "useful idiots." Then check your mirror again.