Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross

The point is, that knowing a group of people mean you harm, is it best to wait them out in the hope they change their mind, or they never achieve the means to do you harm, or to solve the problem now for least cost?

I don't think they are going to change their minds, and I don't think they're going to fail to achieve the means of doing us harm.

I think they should be told, fair and square, unless they change their intentions, and provably give up attaining the means to do us harm, then we will force them.

That puts the onus on them.


5 posted on 09/02/2006 3:08:59 PM PDT by plenipotentiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: plenipotentiary; Paul Ross; elfman2
The point is, that knowing a group of people mean you harm, is it best to wait them out in the hope they change their mind, or they never achieve the means to do you harm, or to solve the problem now for least cost? I don't think they are going to change their minds, and I don't think they're going to fail to achieve the means of doing us harm. I think they should be told, fair and square, unless they change their intentions, and provably give up attaining the means to do us harm, then we will force them. ----

****

I have a neighbor through the woods who is building this great big cannon and pointing it right at our house. He talks all the time about getting rid of my family. What could/or should I do?

10 posted on 09/03/2006 1:48:29 AM PDT by beyond the sea (TWO PENCIL-NECKED DWEEBS NEED A PUBLIC HANGING— DAVID CORN, PARTICK FITZGERALD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson