Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
All it says that state agencies and those receiving state funding shouldn't discriminate on the basis of race, etc., and they added sexual orientation to the list.

We call those camel's noses.

I am not thrilled, but it's hardly earthshaking, it doesn't really change anything. The anti-Arnold elements just tried to whip up hysteria against him.

I don't see an answer there. Was Arnold right or wrong to sign it?

25 posted on 09/04/2006 9:03:14 PM PDT by Invisible Gorilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Invisible Gorilla

Let me get back to basics: the choice is Arnold or Angelides.

Angelides fully embraces the ENTIRE homosexual agenda and said he would sign all the various related bills, including major ones like the homosexual marriage act and teaching the homosexual accomplishments in schools.

Arnold tries to minimize the damage, and was willing to be vilified, but still had the courage to veto some of the worst bills.


So whom do you prefer as governor, Arnold or Angelides?

By trying to undermine Arnold, you are helping Angelides who is in 180 degree opposition to your stated philosophy.


26 posted on 09/04/2006 9:06:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson