Skip to comments.
Suit filed to preserve Ohio's '04 ballots(lefty moonbats file suit)
Cleveland Plain-Dealer ^
| September 1, 2006
| Reginald Fields
Posted on 09/01/2006 5:06:29 AM PDT by Dane
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Due to FR rules I can only provide a link to the Lefty moonbats doing what they do best filing conpriacy lawsuits.
The Cincinnati Enquirer article that can be only linked per FR rules has a list of the lefty plaintiffs who are filling this lawsuit. Their names are to the right of the article.
Link
1
posted on
09/01/2006 5:06:31 AM PDT
by
Dane
To: Dane
2
posted on
09/01/2006 5:08:18 AM PDT
by
Solamente
(Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
To: Dane
3
posted on
09/01/2006 5:11:19 AM PDT
by
Chuck54
( "Your right to privacy is not as important as my right to live".)
To: Solamente
These loonies have convinced themselves they cannot possibly lose an election fair and square.
To: Solamente
![](http://pjcomix.com/images/cryingdummie1.jpg)
Sorelosers
5
posted on
09/01/2006 5:13:10 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(No matter what the left says. G.W. Bush will be remembered as the best president of this century)
To: Solamente
Columbus -- Ballots were sabotaged in Democratic areas, including Cleveland, and double-counted in Republican strongholds during the 2004 presidential election in Ohio, said critics bringing new charges of rigging to favor George W. Bush. If this is what democrats are charging of Republicans, count it as a fact that this is what democrats did do in places like PA and WI. Democrats always accuse Republicans of cheating in the manner of a democrat.
6
posted on
09/01/2006 5:17:41 AM PDT
by
Nomorjer Kinov
(If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
To: Dane
The Founding Fathers were indeed wise. They knew that the common US citizen was not capable of electing their own leaders.
Now 220 years after our Republic was founded -- fear, uncertainty, doubt are all cast on the election process.
The Republic is crumbling.
7
posted on
09/01/2006 5:20:33 AM PDT
by
xrp
(Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
To: Dane
As was widely broadcast, there were problems with punch-card ballots in Florida in the '02 election. In Velusia(sp?) county, they also had another election problem.
Those who print the ballots neglected to include the candidates for a spot on the Board of Land & Water, a local office. Voters were asked to write-in the candidate of their choice.
Water beat Land by more than two to one. I am not making this up.
I always figured Land would have done better in an inland state....Nebraska maybe.
8
posted on
09/01/2006 5:23:24 AM PDT
by
laotzu
To: Nomorjer Kinov
Don't forget Washington where the evidence of fraud is overwhelming.
9
posted on
09/01/2006 5:24:12 AM PDT
by
tdewey10
(Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
To: xrp
I'll bet a person would risk getting shot if one tried to wake some of these "disenfranchised voters" before noon. If I was too stupid to vote, I'd feel disenfranchised too...
10
posted on
09/01/2006 5:25:28 AM PDT
by
chadwimc
To: Dane
Richard Hayes Phillips, a private investigator from Canton, N.Y., hired by Arnebeck, believes voters in some poor and black precincts in Cleveland, Akron and four other urban areas, were given ballots pre-punched for one of the longshot independent candidates. So once again, Democrats are accusing their voters of being too stupid to vote.
" well look Ethel this ballot been already punched, what does you thinks that means."
11
posted on
09/01/2006 5:26:36 AM PDT
by
A message
(We who care, Can Not Fail)
To: A message
All of the areas mentioned are controlled by Democrats and have ballots designed and provided by Democrat controlled elections boards. They did not, they would not, fix the election for Bush.
12
posted on
09/01/2006 5:32:01 AM PDT
by
mak5
To: Dane
By federal law, the secretary of state can destroy the ballots 22 months after the election -- which in this case would be next week. Last chance to bring this (transferrence) into the public and it's just before the next election. Another version of the demonrat playbook that consists solely of "Republicans bad."
13
posted on
09/01/2006 5:46:06 AM PDT
by
CPOSharky
(MSM - Live hizbozo = freedom fighter. Dead hizbozo = innocent civilian.)
To: mak5
Exactly.
These foolish accusations by Democrats are absurd.
14
posted on
09/01/2006 6:04:44 AM PDT
by
A message
(We who care, Can Not Fail)
To: Dane
Ballots were sabotaged in Democratic areas, including Cleveland, and double-counted in Republican strongholds during the 2004 presidential election in Ohio, said critics bringing new charges of rigging to favor George W. Bush. "A drowning man will clutch at a snake."
15
posted on
09/01/2006 6:10:24 AM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: Dane
Richard Hayes Phillips, a private investigator from Canton, N.Y., hired by Arnebeck, believes voters in some poor and black precincts in Cleveland, Akron and four other urban areas, were given ballots pre-punched for one of the longshot independent candidates.
That's exactly what happened in Dade and Broward County in 2000 ... dems pre-punched for Gore and that is why there were so many double punched ballots... the ones where a vote was cast for GW were automatically invalidated as double punched ,, ingeniously simple cheating but you can only pull it off if the watchdogs are asleep...
To: Neidermeyer
Nope. You don't have to 'pre-punch' the ballots at all. Too obvious. What you do INSTEAD with a stack of completed punch ballots - line up a stack, then use a rigid metal rod driven by a hammer THROUGH the GORE punch hole. Those ballots already for GORE are NOT affected. Those for BUSH get double punched and invalidated. You do not so much ADD votes for GORE, but SUBTRACT for BUSH.
Use to be standard tactics in parts of Chicago before they figured out how to tamper with mechanical machines...
Democrats have known about this one for years...
dvwjr
17
posted on
09/01/2006 1:23:02 PM PDT
by
dvwjr
To: chadwimc
No bet.
I don't bet on something I know I'll lose at ;-)
18
posted on
09/01/2006 6:34:36 PM PDT
by
xrp
(Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
To: laotzu
This is about OH, not Florida.
19
posted on
09/01/2006 6:44:09 PM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: Neidermeyer
And where is the evidence that that was the case?
20
posted on
09/01/2006 6:45:25 PM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson