Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor gets global warming, minimum wage, (and universal healthcare) bills
Sacramento Bee ^ | Aug. 31, 2006 | Dan Smith and Clea Benson

Posted on 08/31/2006 5:38:48 PM PDT by FairOpinion

Legislators on Thursday sent Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger a universal health care bill he is likely to veto and a measures increasing the minimum wage and regulating greenhouse gases he is likely to sign.

Lawmakers face a midnight deadline to deal with nearly 200 bills before the scheduled end of the two-year legislative session. Before adjournment, they are expected to send the Republican governor bills to allow phone companies into the cable television market and ban hand-held cell phone use while driving. Also on the table are measures to ease prison overcrowding.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: callegislation; globalwarming; minimumwage; sb840; schwarzenegger; socilizedmedicine; univesalhealthcare
I am glad that he will veto the universal healthcare, i.e. single payer government run socialized medicine bill.

We need to focus on the rootcause of all these horrible bills: the leftist Dem controlled CA Legislature.

They are churning out bills at a rate of 1000 per year, Arnold has been vetoieng about a thirds, but the leftist Dems are just so prolific one just can't keep up with their insanity.

1 posted on 08/31/2006 5:38:50 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Relevant article:

New laws suffocate California

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1686976/posts

Ronald Reagan, Jerry Brown and George Deukmejian added roughly 1,500 new laws yearly; Pete Wilson and Gray Davis about 1,000 annually.

Scary.

But in 2004, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger made news. He vetoed 311 bills. His vetoes caused legislators momentary pause. They sent him “only” 961 laws in 2005. Arnold let 729 become law — a “record low” in our times.


2 posted on 08/31/2006 5:39:49 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Related articles and threads on the univeral healthcare bill:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=sb840


3 posted on 08/31/2006 5:41:53 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Every new law is a reduction in someone's freedom.


4 posted on 08/31/2006 5:50:53 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

It is time for a new round of propositions for the people to check the state gov't on this nonsense.


5 posted on 08/31/2006 5:56:35 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

We could start by passing an initiative dissolving the full time Legislature, including their exorbitant salaries.

The initiative should also limit to no more than 30 days in sesssion and no more than $500/day compensation,

AND NO MORE than 10 bills per year.


6 posted on 08/31/2006 5:58:37 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Lawmakers face a midnight deadline to deal with nearly 200 bills

Doing everything possible to turn the state into a Banana Republic. If someone barred the doors of the assembly, and none of these laws were passed, would life on earth come to a halt? Would anyone notice?

If someone paid state legislators 5 times their state salary to not come to work, to spend their term of office in Cancun, would the state be any worse off? Or would people, somehow, manage to muddle through without them?

I think I'll run for office. My campaign promise is that, if elected, I won't show up for work for two years. I promise.

And I promise that if the others would do the same, the state would be a better place.

7 posted on 08/31/2006 5:58:46 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Go east, young man! (Sound business advice)


8 posted on 08/31/2006 5:58:51 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; calcowgirl; NormsRevenge; SierraWasp; Amerigomag
We need to focus on the root cause of all these horrible bills: the leftist Dem controlled CA Legislature.

What about the leftist controlled governor's office?

Arnold has been vetoing about a thirds,

Last time we had a Republican Governor he was a RINO squish SOB and he vetoed 80% of the bad bills.

but the leftist Dems are just so prolific one just can't keep up with their insanity.

Oh that's ridiculous. Arnold could veto every single damn bill sent to him if he wanted to. What's with this inane "He can't keep up?" A veto takes a signature -- that's all.

9 posted on 08/31/2006 5:59:37 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

"Last time we had a Republican Governor he was a RINO squish SOB and he vetoed 80% of the bad bills."


There you go, spreading incorrect information again.

See my post 2 with link to article that refutes your ludicrous claim.

Why do you have to resort to distortion of the truth?

I know, because the truth shows Arnold in a favorable light.



"Ronald Reagan, Jerry Brown and George Deukmejian added roughly 1,500 new laws yearly; Pete Wilson and Gray Davis about 1,000 annually.

Scary.

But in 2004, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger made news. He vetoed 311 bills. His vetoes caused legislators momentary pause. They sent him “only” 961 laws in 2005. Arnold let 729 become law — a “record low” in our times. "

(see post 2 for link)


10 posted on 08/31/2006 6:04:38 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

YES! Term limits haven't worked....somehow these maniacs have to be reined in.


11 posted on 08/31/2006 6:08:22 PM PDT by bordergal (John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; FairOpinion
What's with this inane ...

The coming few days are not going to be glorious for either Schwarzenegger or his supporters on FreeRepublic.

Once the Austrian is reelected, and he can do it without conservative support, Betsey bar the door. Schwarzenegger can't, however, gain a second term without modest Republican support, hence the FO account on FR. Schwarzenegger's Republican credentials are swiftly evaporating, hence the mad and endless clamor from the FO account on this forum.

For my part, I expect politicians to lie and the Austrian hasn't proved an exception. I expect his supporters to lie and they haven't run afoul of the laws of political persuasion either.

I reason that most on FreeRepublic are political junkies and understand the rules. I expect few Freepers or lurkers place much credence in the tall yarns spun by the FO account during this election cycle.

I guess that's why they call it the silly season.

12 posted on 08/31/2006 6:23:23 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The Austrian is advancing socialism - the minimum wage, state controls on drug pricing and enviro wacko regulatory mandates. Which HE pushed. You don't seem inclined to hold him responsible for his leftist policies.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

13 posted on 08/31/2006 6:28:24 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

No offense, but signing an insane bill like this "greenhouse" bill is so looney that it negates a lot of good works. I see absolutely no rational reason to sign this bill. If the poeple and the legislature want it so badly they can override a veto.

Does the CA constitution provide for anything like a "pocket veto"?


14 posted on 08/31/2006 6:30:10 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

WTF is a "single-payer" health care plan? I hear liberals rattle it off all the time like it's the answer to all our problems, but I've never really heard the details.

I mean, I'm the "single payer" on my company's insurance plan because it comes out of my paycheck. Can anyone tell me what the difference would be?


15 posted on 08/31/2006 6:49:36 PM PDT by Pete98 (After his defeat by the Son of God, Satan changed his name to Allah and started over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I qualified that statement with "bad bills." The vast majority of bills are noncontroversial or minor technical fixes. You can't figure them in to the percentages when I am talking about the BAD bills. Which even that liberal SOB Wilson saw fit to veto.
16 posted on 08/31/2006 6:50:23 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; MurryMom

Does drilling for oil off the coast of Cally effect global warming? Not if we sell the black gold to the Chicoms - eh?


17 posted on 08/31/2006 6:58:49 PM PDT by Libloather (I would give my left arm to be ambidextrous...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Excellent idea! A part-time legislature like Texas would not have time to come up with these insane laws.

PS: For an economic rationale for limiting government read, "Democracy, the God that Failed" by Professor Hoppe. Essentially he argues that unfettered competition in the production of "Goods" is needed in a nation but the open competition in the production of "Bads" like more laws and politicians (that confiscate more and more via taxes( should be limited.


18 posted on 08/31/2006 8:29:35 PM PDT by Howard Jarvis Admirer (Howard Jarvis, the foe of the tax collector and friend of the California homeowner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pete98
Single Payer means one payer for all health care costs I.E. MEDICARE.
19 posted on 08/31/2006 11:46:36 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson