Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soul Seeker
The Lieberman phenomenon, where a partisan base closes ranks around the ‘true partisan’ candidate, seems to be at work in Rhode Island, as it was on the Democratic side in Connecticut.

Well...it isn't quite the Lieberman phenomenon. The Democrat partisans were far smarter in their choice of targets. In Connecticut, a Democrat will continue to hold a Democrat seat. In RI, the phenomenon will result in a Democrat taking a Republican seat. Is that what the 'partisan' base wants?

Why the hell the GOP has rushed protect this worthless RINO rather then funnel more to Santorum, Steele, Bouchard, House seats (and challengers like Irey) etc...is beyond me.

Because the GOP realizes that Chaffee can win, and Laffey can not. Unlike the partisans, the GOP knows that the keeping control of the Senate is an important goal. The partisans seem to think they would have more luck advancing their agenda in a Democrat controlled Senate.
167 posted on 08/31/2006 4:24:55 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: goldfinch
In RI, the phenomenon will result in a Democrat taking a Republican seat.

The Democrats already own the seat policy wise. No loss.

If you are refering to numbers, if it's split 50/50 Chafee jumps. Whether you believe that doesn't matter. He's held meetings with Dems before and announced that's a probability. Fact is he's EARNED distrust. If that bothers you, direct it to candidate that has convinced people he'll pull a Jeffords in a heartbeat.

Because the GOP realizes that Chaffee can win, and Laffey can not.

Last I checked some of the polls had Chafee losing in the general election. So, no, they don't know he can win. They hope he can win. And they would waste campaign funds that could result in gains elsewhere, or at very least SAVE seats, to save a candidate that isn't reliable, may jump ship, and is more Liberal then Feingold and Clinton.

This is the only response you'll get from me. I'm spent too many months arguing the issue and I'm tired of the repetition. Nothing I'm saying now is different then what I said three months ago. Address my old posts for answers to your questions about Chafee. The same responses given then will apply to any statements you direct me now.

The fact remains that when even party man Hewitt is on my side I consider the argument won.

170 posted on 08/31/2006 4:39:32 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson