Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medical costs are justified, study asserts
Seattle PI ^ | Aug 31, 2006 | Jeff Donn

Posted on 08/31/2006 8:37:30 AM PDT by phantomworker

Despite exploding costs, most Americans got sizable life-extending bang for their medical bucks over recent decades, says one of the most sweeping studies ever of health care value.

AMERICAN LIFE EXPECTANCY 1960 -- 69.9 1970 -- 70.8 1980 -- 73.9 1990 -- 75.4 2000 -- 76.9 Source: National Vital Statistics System

That might come as a surprise to anyone who has ever shuddered over a medical bill, and the report itself raises doubts over how quickly costs have escalated.

However, the study calculated that Americans of all ages spent an average of $19,900 on medical care for each extra year of life expectancy gained over the last four decades of the 20th century. And that cost is worth it, the study authors say.

"On average, the return is very high," concludes study leader David Cutler, a Harvard University health economist. "But it's getting worse for ... in particular, the elderly."

"The rising cost of health care has been the source of a lot of saber rattling in the media and the public square, without anyone seriously analyzing the benefits gained," Cutler said. "But the dramatic increase in life expectancy that we've seen over the last decades shows that rising medical costs have been largely justified."

The analysis was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Aging and the Lasker Foundation and was published in today's New England Journal of Medicine.

Patrick Boyle, 74, is a prime example of what good medical care and intervention can do.

The Shoreline resident climbed Mount Si when he was 57 years old. When he reached the top, he was in the midst of a heart attack, but it wasn't diagnosed until later that day.

"When I got to the top, I was sweating profusely. We thought it was heat exhaustion....

(Excerpt) Read more at seattlepi.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: healthcare; medicalcosts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 08/31/2006 8:37:31 AM PDT by phantomworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sionnsar; Paleo Conservative; freepatriot32
Interesting twist: looking at the rising benefits of health care, not just the rising costs.
2 posted on 08/31/2006 8:40:33 AM PDT by phantomworker (A camel is a horse designed by committee. Sofa king crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

You could make the cost of a life saving operation $10 or $10 million and it would still be worth it. That doesn't mean that everything is hunky-dorry. It just means that the guys who study these things don't get it. The idea is to provide good health care efficiently--not to provide good service at any cost.


3 posted on 08/31/2006 8:41:50 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

That is correct, Brilliant! They can charge us anything because no one questions the cost.


4 posted on 08/31/2006 8:45:14 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; neverdem
Others were troubled. "The fact that someone is writing this paper shows how desperate the health care system is to justify these out-of-control increases in health spending," said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, a consumer advocate who heads health research at Public Citizen.

You're right.

5 posted on 08/31/2006 8:47:34 AM PDT by phantomworker (A camel is a horse designed by committee. Sofa king crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker
AMERICAN LIFE EXPECTANCY 1960 -- 69.9 1970 -- 70.8 1980 -- 73.9 1990 -- 75.4 2000 -- 76.9 Source: National Vital Statistics System

Life expectancy is not a perfect statistic to evaluate health care. If a crack-head shhots you in the face and kills you instantly when you are 17 years old, does that reflect poorly on the health care system? A better measure might exclude certain deaths (violent, accidental, etc.) where the health care system had no ability to play a role pro or con.

Based on increase violent crime in this country over the past couple of generations, the healthcare system may be doing an even better job than is suspected.

6 posted on 08/31/2006 8:48:17 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some Freepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker
Medical costs are justified, study asserts

There is no twisted illogic on earth that can ever justify charging $24 for one Band-Aid.
7 posted on 08/31/2006 8:48:32 AM PDT by Xenalyte (No movie shall triumph over "Snakes on a Plane.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

Blame lawyers for it all.


8 posted on 08/31/2006 8:54:33 AM PDT by vpintheak (Yep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

I'd like to see a study explaining the return we're getting from exploding college costs. Strange silence on that one.


9 posted on 08/31/2006 8:56:54 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

Was it decorative or have rhinestones attached? Did Dr. Dreamy apply it? :-)

That is outrageous. I remember something similar for a couple of tissues from a Kleenex box.


10 posted on 08/31/2006 8:58:36 AM PDT by phantomworker (A camel is a horse designed by committee. Sofa king crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
You could make the cost of a life saving operation $10 or $10 million and it would still be worth it.

To a point, that might be true, but our society doesn't have unlimited resources, and there are only so many $10 million surgeries (or more likely for that much money, extensive treatment plans) people can have without decimating other parts of the economy. Obviously, if someone has that much money and is willing to pay for such a surgery, it's great that he has that opportunity, but most people don't and there's not much that can be done about it.

11 posted on 08/31/2006 9:00:11 AM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
$24 for a Band-Aid? Only the government could pay that much.

If, however, you mean a checkout by a nurse who then applies the Band-Aid, that's another story.

12 posted on 08/31/2006 9:02:25 AM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

It wasn't even a Disney band-aid.

And don't ask how much we paid for the two Tylenol.


13 posted on 08/31/2006 9:04:05 AM PDT by Xenalyte (No movie shall triumph over "Snakes on a Plane.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

On average, the return is very high," concludes study leader David Cutler, a Harvard University health economist. "But it's getting worse for ... in particular, the elderly."

But are we living longer in a reduced state of physical capacity so that we can spend all of our money on a low quality of life due to a healthcare racket. Call Elliot Spitzer.


14 posted on 08/31/2006 9:04:34 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar

No, I'm talking about a line on the itemized bill for an ER visit.

If they want to charge beaucoup dollars for the nurse, fine. But make it "Nurse, $900 an hour." Don't try to "hide" it in $47 Tylenols and $24 Band-Aids.


15 posted on 08/31/2006 9:05:07 AM PDT by Xenalyte (No movie shall triumph over "Snakes on a Plane.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Life expectancy is not a perfect statistic to evaluate health care

Life expectancy is a bogus statistic to begin with. More premature infants are surviving now and violent crime has actually decreased, not increased. That raises life expectancy statistics but it doesn't mean that you are going to live longer.
.
16 posted on 08/31/2006 9:29:52 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

The article conveniently sidesteps the fact that the people getting the benefit are largely not the ones paying for it. In many cases, hardworking people are shelling out huge amounts in taxes and in insurance premiums which have been artificially inflated by socialist government regulations, to extend the lives of people who have never made any net contribution to the economy in spite of being quite able to do so.


17 posted on 08/31/2006 10:11:04 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
and violent crime has actually decreased, not increased.

Depends on the timeframe, right? Didn't it peak sometime maybe in the 80's? Lower now than then, but higher now than, say, the 1950's?

18 posted on 08/31/2006 10:21:04 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some Freepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

I started seeing a chiropractor over 2 years ago - nothing has been better for improving my health, strengthening my immune system, and reducing stress.

It's not anything that the medical doctors, hospitals, insurance nor drug industries would like you to know though. Check your search engines for 'AMA vs Taylor' back in 1973 I think - typical response from the MSM to follow the money. Even though Taylor - a chiropractor - won the case the MSM played it up that they are/were 'quacks.'

Look for a chiropractor who takes x-rays first too - preferrably a Palmer graduate.


19 posted on 08/31/2006 11:42:04 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

"You could make the cost of a life saving operation $10 or $10 million and it would still be worth it. That doesn't mean that everything is hunky-dorry. It just means that the guys who study these things don't get it. The idea is to provide good health care efficiently--not to provide good service at any cost."

Exactly.
I took my bleeding 2 yr. old son to the ER and instead of stitches, they put a few drops of that new glue into his head wound to bind him up.
I would guess it too 4-5 drops of the stuff to do the job.
What was my insurance company billed for?
$980.00.


20 posted on 08/31/2006 11:48:36 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson