Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bjs1779
Are you saying he did not try to kill her in 1993?

I'm saying that you have exactly zero evidence of that, especially zero evidence in the court records. Wild allegations made by Terri's parents years after the fact, made when they didn't get a big pot of money from Michael Schiavo, are not evidence.

545 posted on 09/06/2006 4:31:32 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]


To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
I'm saying that you have exactly zero evidence of that, especially zero evidence in the court records

November 1993

Michael Schiavo Deposition, Guardianship Hearing

Q. What was her bladder condition?
MS. She had a UTI.

Q. What is that?
MS. Urinary tract infection..

Q. What did the doctor tell you treatment for that would be?
MS. Antibiotic usually..

Q. And did he tell you what would occur if you failed to treat that infection? What did he tell you?
MS. That sometimes urinary tract infection will turn to sepsis..

Q. And sepsis is what?
MS. An infection throughout the body..

Q. And what would the result of untreated sepsis be to the patient?
MS. The patient would pass on..

Q. So when you made the decision not to treat Terri's bladder infection you, in effect, were making a decision to allow her to pass on?
MS. I was making a decision on what Terri would want..

Q. Had the bladder condition been treated?.
MS. Yes.

Q. And was...what was the reason that the bladder condition was treated?
MS. Sable Palms Nursing Home said they could not do that by some Florida law which wasn't stated..

Q. But you didn't change your opinion or your decision to not treat the bladder condition?
MS. We did change it..

Q. Correct?
MS. Repeat the question..

Q. You did not change your decision not to treat the bladder condition, correct?
MS. I had to change my decision..

Q. Sable Palms changed it for you?
Attorney Nillson Objection.

Q. Okay. Is there any reason that you would not make the same decision that you previously made if the problem came up again?
MS. Repeat your question. You're losing me here..

Q. Let me be more specific. If your wife developed another condition that could result in her death, is there any reason that you would not take the position that you're not going to treat that condition and you're going to instruct the doctor not to treat that condition?
MS. I wouldn't instruct anybody, no..

Q. You instructed the doctor not to treat the condition, correct?
Attorney Nillson Objection.

Q. You did instruct the doctor not to treat her bladder condition, correct?
MS. Uh-huh. Yes..

Q. If a similar...would you do the same?
MS. I'm thinking..

Q. Take your time.
MS. I probably wouldn't instruct the doctor to do it..

Q. So you've changed your opinion?
MS. Sort of, yeah..

Q. Why have you changed your opinion?
MS. Because evidently there is a law out there that says I can't do it..

Q. Is that the only reason?
MS. Basically, maybe..

Q. What you're telling me is, is that there is nothing in your belief or feelings that have changed. The only thing that has changed is the fact that you perceive the law prevents you to do what you intended to do
MS. Correct..

Q. What did you do with your wife's jewelry?
MS. My wife's jewelry?.

Q. Yeah.
MS. Um, I think I took her engagement ring and her...what do they call it...diamond wedding band and made a ring for myself..

Q. What did you do with her cats?
MS. Her cats were put to sleep n the advice of my mother-in-law.

(Note: The veterinarian who performed the euthanasia of Terri's pets came forward to say there was never any suggestion from Terri's mother that this be done and it was done only on Mr. Schiavo's insistence.)

549 posted on 09/06/2006 4:41:28 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson