Yeah, duh.... I think we should all try it! < /s >
End of life decisions can be much more painful and complicated than you and your band of obnoxious activists will ever acknowledge. That's why I don't want ~you~ involved in my life either. :~)
If there's disagreement about the best course of treatment among doctors or family or anyone else with ~standing~ (and that's not you!) there are the local courts to argue and settle disputes. But it would be a travesty if any but those who absolutely can't come to an agreement ended up getting dragged through that.
I know you disagree... My hope is that people with your extreme point of view ~don't~ get elected to office.
erring on the side of life is extreme..????? I agree with your analysis but not your conclusion.... I prefer that end of life be decided by family, and when the family can not agree the LOCAL courts hear the case, and if there is still no agreement, the State MUST err on the side of life... The State of Florida FAILED all of us in this case..... I don't think this position is at all "extreme"
Murder is not a medical decision. What is this, the new holocaust?
I was an extremist for Jeb Bush back then, you might say. So, how do you feel about Jeb Bush?