Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc

So by your logic, if continuing a pregancy would likely be fatal to a woman, she should be forced to do so anyway?


30 posted on 08/30/2006 4:15:01 PM PDT by Huntress (Proud owner of Norman/Norma, the transsexual cat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Huntress

"So by your logic"

Just a minute. Get one thing straight. This is not "my logic." This is a position that has been widely held throughout Western Civilization for a couple of thousand years. That's what you're arguing against; not just some faceless turkey on the internet.

"if continuing a pregancy would likely be fatal to a woman, she should be forced to do so anyway?"

Tendentiously phrased, wouldn't you say? "Forced," as though to say "Of course she would kill her baby to save herself."


47 posted on 08/30/2006 4:33:27 PM PDT by dsc (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Huntress; dsc
So by your logic, if continuing a pregancy would likely be fatal to a woman, she should be forced to do so anyway?

Good grief.

If a pregnancy is found to be life threatening, it is either a tubal pregnancy, which is a in a class by itself, or is usually late enough in the pregnancy that the baby can be delivered early and put in NICU.

It doesn't have to be killed by abortion.

94 posted on 01/31/2012 5:38:04 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson