Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GMMAC

It sounds like the government is applying the new passport law to his application, not directly violating the court order (which was based on the old law).


11 posted on 08/30/2006 5:06:46 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: conservative in nyc
From the article: "In the ruling, Judge Phelan suggested that Mr. Khadr could face some hurdles in his passport application since national-security considerations were written into passport law after his case came to light. Mr. MacKay has now denied that reapplication using the new rules."

While I'm not particularly a fan of Peter McKay's as there's a lot of red-Toryism (RINOism) in his political history, he is a former Crown Prosecutor and seemingly a pretty smart lawyer.

This is actually a brilliant and big time ballsy move: essentially, the Harper government is daring activist Judges to attempt to overrule "black letter law" aimed at combating terrorism (Islamofascism).

If the Judges want a showdown with Parliament as to who's ultimately in charge, Harper & McKay couldn't possibly have picked more favorable terrain upon which to fight any battle for public opinion.

Smart money says the Judges realize as much & will be the ones to blink if Khadr now opts to challenge the law itself.

BTW, I'm amazed this thread hasn't generated 100+ comments from Canadian FReepers alone - this is truly huge!
12 posted on 08/30/2006 5:23:07 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson