Replies

That is why the squibs racing "up" #7 seem to be a different monster to me. What would explain that?

I still don't get the squib thing, I guess, and I do not recall "squibs" racing down the towers but massive floor-by-floor expulsions of smoke and paper and dust. But it seems perfectly obviously to me that if one building is pancaking from the top down, and another building is pancaking from the bottom up, that THAT is the reason you think the squibs, if they exist and if what they appear to be doing matters at all, may look like they're racing DOWN in the top-to-bottom collapse and UP in the bottom-to-top collapse. Doesn't it to you?

Anyway, I don't know what pictures you've seen of #7, but I don't know how you could look at any pictures of #7's southern face (short side of the trapezoid, remember) from the afternoon of 9/11 and not conclude that it was burning like a mofo.

If you are serious, I will find and post what few photos I have.

If you're not serious, and instead are the typical 9/11 doubter that gets sexually aroused by obsessively asking the same questions over and over on different forums, please don't waste my time. I am a married woman now and I don't want to play that.

But it seems perfectly obviously to me that if one building is pancaking from the top down, and another building is pancaking from the bottom up, that THAT is the reason you think the squibs, if they exist and if what they appear to be doing matters at all, may look like they're racing DOWN in the top-to-bottom collapse and UP in the bottom-to-top collapse. Doesn't it to

But the government itself has dismissed the so-called "pancake" theory. That's even in the NIST report posted on this thread.

Anyway, I don't know what pictures you've seen of #7, but I don't know how you could look at any pictures of #7's southern face (short side of the trapezoid, remember) from the afternoon of 9/11 and not conclude that it was burning like a mofo.

If you are serious, I will find and post what few photos I have.

Yes I am very serious. I'm not trying to win an argument. If you have these pictures, please print them. I would love to take them to some of these 9-11 critics and ask them to reconcile them with their arguments.

I am also interested in the best websites that aim to debunk the "conspiracy theories". The few that I have seen have been sub par.

Here are the only pictures that I have ever been able to find on Google and none of them show these massive fires you are referring to.

The only photo that I did find that purports to show the southern side of building 7 on fire is the following, but it is unclear to me if this is fire or the dust cloud from the collapse of WTC Tower 1.

You would think if the southern face of the building was so dang bad off, the north side would indicate this as well (supposedly the pictures I posted above were close to the time of the collapse). What would keep such an inferno from spreading horizontally?