Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: streetpreacher
Do you have a reasonable explanation for why a 46 floor 600 ft tall building like WTC 7, which was shielded by WTC 5 and 6 (both of which had extensive fire damage but did not collapse), collapsed in and on itself even though it was not hit by a plane and only had minor fires on only two of it's floors?

So, what are your qualifications as an architect or as a civil engineer for evaluating the circumstances of the WTC 7 collapse?

155 posted on 08/30/2006 4:04:41 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

What are yours? I rely on the evidence of others like most normal sane people when researching a topic. The problem is that the 9-11 Commission didn't even investigate WTC 7.


158 posted on 08/30/2006 4:09:53 PM PDT by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson