Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Durus
he then goes further stating that Hobbes was a conservative and Locke was a liberal

By the standards of their time, they were. Just as Jefferson was a "liberal" based on an early 19th century definition of that term. Today's conservatives would have far more in common with Locke, and Jefferson, than today's liberals. I think Hart was referring to the classical definitions, but he should have made that clear.

17 posted on 08/30/2006 1:43:54 PM PDT by massadvj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: massadvj
I did mention this in my comment. I stand by my statement that if he is referring to the 18th/19th definition of those term then the entire essay becomes pointless.
18 posted on 08/30/2006 1:53:33 PM PDT by Durus ("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson