Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New World Disorder: Superhighway 'security' benefits questioned
WorldNetDaily ^ | August 30, 2006 | WorldNetDaily

Posted on 08/30/2006 6:02:42 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
To: 1rudeboy

You are using deceit.


41 posted on 08/30/2006 9:48:44 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
I recall that you presented yourself as a demolition expert on another thread, and then was busted for presenting bogus 'expert' info by someone who actually is involved with demolitions. Who exactly are you 'involved' with that 'knows what is happening'?

You are referring to the Mackanic Bridge article. No, I was not busted, and another EOD individual even agreed with me. Further, I spent 6 years on a Special Forces A-Team as a demolitions expert.
42 posted on 08/30/2006 10:05:29 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: deport
Assume that I wish to destroy a portion of the freeway (a bridge, or whatever), and a few other things (maybe some railroad tracks, a pipeline, or a transmission tower). Do people realize the size of the charge necessary? Lets say it would be OKC-bomb size. It would still probably have to be at least partially buried.
43 posted on 08/30/2006 10:06:49 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rex Anderson

ping.


44 posted on 08/30/2006 10:07:15 AM PDT by PDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat; Lobbyist

Are you aware that a Mexican port sitting on I-35 is opening in Kansas City in the near future? Are you aware they are projecting over 1,000 trucks per day from Mexico to Kansas City? Are you aware the rail system is being expanded to handle the cargo containers from Mexico to Kansas City?


45 posted on 08/30/2006 10:14:41 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

I think you mean a Mexican "customs office," not a "port."


46 posted on 08/30/2006 10:22:12 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

And it's for American exports leaving Kansas City so they don't have to go through customs at the Mexican border.


47 posted on 08/30/2006 10:30:10 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
And it's for American exports leaving Kansas City so they don't have to go through customs at the Mexican border.

Because the 'Mexican border' will be erased by this project.
48 posted on 08/30/2006 10:35:02 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

You know, if all those U.S. Customs preclearance facilities overseas are intended to erase national borders, then they are doing a piss-poor job.


49 posted on 08/30/2006 10:38:17 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
Are you aware that a Mexican port sitting on I-35 is opening in Kansas City in the near future? Are you aware they are projecting over 1,000 trucks per day from Mexico to Kansas City? Are you aware the rail system is being expanded to handle the cargo containers from Mexico to Kansas City?

Um yeah, at the airfield south of KC (near Grandview, Girbaeu Airport or some such name) served by the KCS. Though actually it isn't on I-35 but between the US69 and US 71 freeways. The Mexican border officials will be there to inspect, seal, and do the paperwork for containers BOUND for Mexico. KCS partnered in t 1 of the 3 rail concessions when Mexico privatized its previously nationalized railroad. They now have majority control, and are working with Hutchison-Whampoa to develop the port of Lazaro Cardenas. The idea is to capture the overflow traffic from LA (remember the port shutdown a few years ago and the delays that happen every year from congestion at the LA port, LA freeways, and rail routes funneling to there?) and also some of the warehousing, sorting, repacking, and distribution business (think jobs) that is taking place in So. Cal. and spilling over into the high desert of Victorville. Since that is some of the most expensive real estate in the country, there is plenty of opportunity to capture some of the growth in this warehouse segment. That's what San Antonio, Dallas, Houston, Memphis, and a number of other cities are trying to do. KC is simply trying to replicate this inland port concept, which has been taking place for years at Front Royal, VA. The only difference here is that instead of through the port of Norfolk the containers will come in from a Mexican port, with the word "Mexican" setting off the ignorant knee-jerk crowd the way "Bush" sets off their intellectual equals on the left.

Are you aware of Front Royal? That KCS is already shipping containers from Lazaro Cardenas to Atlanta, with plans to open a new intermodal terminal outside of Houston? How many trucks per day travel to/through KC every day? How much that increases a year? That KC and their planned inland port aren't anything new or unique? And who exactly are 'they' that you keep referring to?

Warehousing and distribution traditionally takes place near the port of import. Inland cities are trying to capture some of that business. So you are opposing KC capturing some of this business (and huge number of jobs) instead of it taking place next to Mexican ports?

50 posted on 08/30/2006 10:38:53 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

That's just not true no matter how many times you say it.


51 posted on 08/30/2006 10:40:58 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

If it's not true why are so many banks offering services in spanish only signs at the branches, why all the dual language packaging in stores, why are illegals given a whole buffet of welfare style services as well as the ability to buy houses and cars, etc.?.......all of which can be done by using matricula cards created by the Mexican gov't. and endorsed by our gutless politicians?


52 posted on 08/30/2006 11:00:04 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

I think this has been in the works a very long time in Kansas City. If one would get into tht area where the caves are one would hear it called an international trade zone 25 years ago. Of course, the rail hub dates from the stockyard days.


53 posted on 08/30/2006 11:06:07 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.All generalizations are false, including this one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I think you mean a Mexican "customs office," not a "port."

No, I mean port. KC SMARTPORT - America's Inland Port Solution
54 posted on 08/30/2006 11:10:05 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: american spirit

You're talking about something else entirely. Nobody disputes that hispanics, millions of them illegals, are here in this country. That the free market considers them potential customers.

That doesn't affect the legal status of the border.


55 posted on 08/30/2006 11:21:05 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
That's what San Antonio, Dallas, Houston, Memphis, and a number of other cities are trying to do. KC is simply trying to replicate this inland port concept, which has been taking place for years at Front Royal, VA. The only difference here is that instead of through the port of Norfolk the containers will come in from a Mexican port, with the word "Mexican" setting off the ignorant knee-jerk crowd the way "Bush" sets off their intellectual equals on the left.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

It may be nearly 1,000 miles to the border from Kansas City, but this industrial hub will soon start building an inland port that would whisk thousands of trucks through export inspections and shoot them back out onto the North American Free Trade Agreement corridor, where they can roll through the border without further delays.

The $3 million facility, which would be the first foreign customs office inside the United States, will likely be approved by the U.S. and Mexican governments by year's end and is scheduled to open next May, said Chris Gutierrez, president of Kansas City SmartPort Inc., a nonprofit organization promoting the project. Planners say manufacturing industries in the upper Midwest and Canada would be the first to benefit from the new customs operation, which they believe could expand to handle cargo from across the country.

56 posted on 08/30/2006 11:23:20 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Gee, how shocking, a marketing person for an econ development project in competition with numerous other cities CLAIMING that his project is somehow unique.

Research inland ports, Front Royal, Dallas' "Agile Port" (stupid name), "The Port of San Antonio" (LOL), etc. It has all being done or proposed elsewhere around the country.


57 posted on 08/30/2006 11:49:44 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

You don't see the correlation between allowing all these illegals in here as a gradual dissolution of our soverignty and border? Ever gave any thought that the reason this is going on is a conditioning process to force Americans to accept this No. American Union the business/political elite want to ram down our collective throats?


58 posted on 08/30/2006 12:15:01 PM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Why do you support secret policy making? Are you afraid the light of day will hurt our democracy? What is your stake in all of this that you find secrecy so appealing?


I've been asking them the same question and all I get is "Your a Kook". Whispering: I think they have complete trust in Gov and the big Corps.


59 posted on 08/30/2006 12:18:53 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
But this nuch in one confined area?


Terrorist aside, any number of pipeline, train, or auto accidents could shut the whole thing down. Monstrosity is a good word for it.
60 posted on 08/30/2006 12:26:25 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson