Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fairfield attorney accused of killing neighbor
Boston Globe ^ | 8-30-06

Posted on 08/30/2006 3:14:40 AM PDT by Cagey

Edited on 08/30/2006 3:23:20 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. --A Fairfield lawyer has been charged with stabbing his neighbor to death after learning the man had molested his 2-year-old daughter, police said.

Fairfield authorities said attorney Jonathon Edington leaped through 58-year-old Barry James' bedroom window Monday and stabbed him nearly a dozen times in the chest. Edington, 29, was arraigned on murder and burglary charges Tuesday in Bridgeport Superior Court. He was held on $1 million bond and is scheduled to return to court on Sept. 12.


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: jurynullification
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-208 next last
To: Cagey

Burglary just means he broke into the house, not that he stole anything.


81 posted on 08/30/2006 5:05:45 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
he went out and hunted the guy down

But a justified killing, nonetheless.

82 posted on 08/30/2006 5:07:10 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: olderwiser

I know people have called it that, but that is not what it is, and it's a pity that the OJ fiasco is most people's only exposure to "jury nullification." That provides ammo to those who wish there were no such thing, since they can apply it to such a travesty of justice. Because I have respect for the real thing I won't use the term referring to OJ Simpson's acquittal.


83 posted on 08/30/2006 5:07:34 AM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Interesting that they also charged him with burglary.

Well, if he took something (other than the other guy's life), you've got breaking and entering and larceny.

I hope it goes to trial -- not the burglary, the homicide. I'm wondering if the trial would turn into a prosecution of the deceased. If you can show that the deceased did molest the child, then, yeah, ceteris paribus, nullification would be the way I'd go if I were on the jury.

Lovely as it is to think of this kind of amateur punishment, there are problems. What if the guy did not molest his daughter? What if the killer was intoxicated at the time?

When an officer of the court takes the law into his own hands, you've got a mess.

84 posted on 08/30/2006 5:08:02 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Reality is not optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
If you can show that the deceased did molest the child, then, yeah, ceteris paribus, nullification would be the way I'd go if I were on the jury.

Unfortunately since he's now dead and therefore unable to stand trial there's only so much that can be done along this line.

Looking at things sheerly pragmatically, if you're going to kill someone who committed a crime against a family member, wait until after they've been found guilty and given some ridiculously light sentence.

85 posted on 08/30/2006 5:10:29 AM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

LOL. I run multi-million dollar construction projects, thanks though.

Typically in a SSS situation, one would not want to raise suspicion with one of those. Not too many Fairfield lawyers would have the first clue as to how to run one, as well.



86 posted on 08/30/2006 5:11:11 AM PDT by Toby06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

If I was the juror, I would vote, "Not Guilty" !


87 posted on 08/30/2006 5:11:27 AM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
Agree, it's manslaughter at least. It would be justifiable if he caught the man in the act, but since there was no immediate threat and he went out in search of the other man, it's not legally justifiable homicide.

You do not have a daughter, do you? If so, you must not really give a damn about her.

88 posted on 08/30/2006 5:12:59 AM PDT by Toby06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

Ow! You wound me to the quick! Ow!


89 posted on 08/30/2006 5:15:04 AM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
It's not justifiable homicide

If the deceased is in fact guilty, it's "commendable homicide".

90 posted on 08/30/2006 5:15:33 AM PDT by steve-b ("Creation Science" is to the religous right what "Global Warming" is to the socialist left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DB
Assuming the neighbor really did molest his daughter in the true sense of the word, then good riddance. Give the father 40 hours of community service and say justice was done.

And the time spent ridding the world of the child molestor counts.

91 posted on 08/30/2006 5:17:18 AM PDT by steve-b ("Creation Science" is to the religous right what "Global Warming" is to the socialist left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

Temporary justifiablity. If he saw the deed that he was avenging, if he was the only witness- then he did the right thing. This is Massachussetts we are talking about. Chances are the molester would get sentenced to community service.


92 posted on 08/30/2006 5:17:32 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
What I was trying to say was that the defense might want to turn the trial into a prosecution of the victim. If it's a jury trial the defense would want the jury thinking that the deceased needed killing. I would want to refer to the CHILD as the victim and the now dead guy as the perp, and that's the way I'd want the jury thinking.

So if I were prosecuting, I'd try to argue that that was irrelevant. What we have, I'd say, is someone who thinking a crime had been committed against a family member, took the law into his own hands and made himself judge, jury, and executioner. And we can't have that in a civilized blah blah blah.

I think you're right about waiting, but of course prudent judgment ain't got nothin' to do with it.

93 posted on 08/30/2006 5:18:24 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Reality is not optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

This is one of the very few time I will praise an attorney.

May they all wake up and renounce their evil -- hopefully without having to confront this harsh face of reality that they have created.

My prayers to the child.


94 posted on 08/30/2006 5:19:05 AM PDT by TimesDomain (When a judge declares himself "MASTER", you become his "SLAVE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Involuntary PigSlaughter


95 posted on 08/30/2006 5:19:56 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup ("Is it real? Or is it Reuters?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

he went out and hunted the guy downerhaps it's online somewhere?


96 posted on 08/30/2006 5:20:57 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Nancy Grace needs to sink her teeth into this one.

The poor father was distraught and went temporarily insane.

One less child molester on the street. He did society a favor... Not guilty!

97 posted on 08/30/2006 5:21:08 AM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olderwiser
"Jury nullification" was the term used during the case

"Investment" is the term used by liberals to describe robbing Peter to pay Paul, but that doesn't make it so.

98 posted on 08/30/2006 5:21:24 AM PDT by steve-b ("Creation Science" is to the religous right what "Global Warming" is to the socialist left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
he went out and hunted the guy down

perhaps it's online somewhere?

99 posted on 08/30/2006 5:22:09 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

The Story as written sounds like Justifiable homicide.


100 posted on 08/30/2006 5:22:22 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson