Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pollyannaish; mockingbyrd
Glad to read others write things similar to what I have always thought about Kinkade's paintings.

I prefer simpler paintings with more drama and less fluff (although the one posted atop this thread is one of the less fluffiated of his paintings and therefore easier on my eye).

It may seem a contradiction but I love Monet's works. I read that he had astigmatism and when given a pair of glasses, reportedly said if that's what the world looks like, he'd go back to his former way of seeing things.


424 posted on 08/30/2006 11:17:50 AM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: pollyannaish; mockingbyrd
The difficulty with appreciating Monet's art on a PC monitor is you're so close to it. Nevertheless, I wanted to post this beauty, "The Thames at Westminster." Larger version. When you see the larger version, the majesty of the composition, drama, and light are truly appreciable.


432 posted on 08/30/2006 11:29:48 AM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson