Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the invisib1e hand
The point is that he "created a relationship of trust" intended to lead them to invest money in galleries he knew were bad investments. I don't know the law surrounding this issue well, but it could be significant.

Now, having said that, I will say that the one or two times I wandered into one of those galleries I thought they were way over done, a little high on the snob-appeal, and really kinda weird.

Snob appeal? I doubt there is one serious art snob who has anything but total derision for his work.

26 posted on 08/29/2006 2:56:07 PM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Young Scholar

You wrote, "I doubt there is one serious art snob who has anything but total derision for his work."

True, and I'm one of them. I do, however, admire his marketing savvy and his undeniable flair for self-promotion. He's sort of a hybrid between Norman Rockwell and Andy Warhol (both of whom I like, by the way, weird as that sounds).

The FBI can investigate all they want, but Kincaid will ultimately win, either in a criminal case or a civil suit, or both. Any jury will come to the conclusion that people who open a store in a retail gallery showing only the work of one artist are inviting disaster.


78 posted on 08/29/2006 4:10:08 PM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Young Scholar
the law surrounding this...

it's caveat emptor. or at least it would be if he weren't a Christian with deep pockets.

I doubt there is one serious art snob who has anything but total derision for his work.

well, don't think you'd run into one of those working in the freaking gallery would you? But the people there, such as they were -- and I gather that they wouldn't qualify as snobs up in your rarified atmosphere -- were a tad snotty all the same. In the way you'd expect someone hawking Thomas Kincaide paintings to be. You know, Christian snotty.

79 posted on 08/29/2006 4:10:51 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (hack for liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Young Scholar
>>The point is that he "created a relationship of trust" intended to lead them to invest money in galleries he knew were bad investments.

Here is where the "Legal problem is: "he knew were bad investments" Prove what he knew.. Hmm...
331 posted on 08/30/2006 8:03:09 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson