Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior
What about it?

Is it soft unfossilized tissue or not?

The duckbill didn't have soft tissue but apparently this t rex had tissue that retained its "original flexibility and transparency".

That is the real point of this thread isn't it?
41 posted on 08/29/2006 10:29:30 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman
First off, we aren't dealing with the T-Rex tissue with this article. Secondly, from your quotes it appears you get your data from creationist web sites, and they are not renowned for telling the whole truth.

BTW, why do you insist on going off on a tangent like this? Are you unable to discuss the subject of the thread?

46 posted on 08/29/2006 10:51:46 AM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson