Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sopater

It's kind of a badly-written article. While soft tissues are mentioned, it appears that this fossil is completely fossilized. What is rare is that soft tissues were also fossilized, which allows them to be studied. In most fossils, all soft tissues decompose before fossilization.

Having the entire animal fossilized will allow study of the structure of all that soft tissue, a rare thing in fossils. It doesn't mean that the soft tissue has not been mineralized (converted to stone).


3 posted on 08/29/2006 8:37:57 AM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


===> Placemarker <===
5 posted on 08/29/2006 8:39:24 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Evolution is real, deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: MineralMan
The evidence goes a long way to justify what many paleontologists are having a hard time believing — that Leonardo is as well preserved as Murphy says it is and how, after millions of years, that is even possible

an interesting sentence here...

6 posted on 08/29/2006 8:40:26 AM PDT by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: MineralMan

Thank you for that clarification. It was not very well written.
susie


19 posted on 08/29/2006 9:19:01 AM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: MineralMan
While soft tissues are mentioned, it appears that this fossil is completely fossilized.

What this indicates is that the process of fossilization was either much more accelerated than what is typically assumed in this instance (and similar others), or that the decay process was somehow inhibited or greatly impeded for the soft-tissue to mineralize before being completely decayed.
28 posted on 08/29/2006 9:42:37 AM PDT by Sopater (Creatio Ex Nihilo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: MineralMan
Tuesday morning the scientists looked at the keratin forming Leonardo's beak, which, like cartilage, is usually dissolved in time.

It is poorly written, but the above sentence seems to indicate they are studying the original un-fossilized beak material.

29 posted on 08/29/2006 9:45:33 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: MineralMan
it appears that this fossil is completely fossilized

No chance of a Jurassic Park, eh?

40 posted on 08/29/2006 10:29:21 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: MineralMan

Excellent clarification.


42 posted on 08/29/2006 10:29:47 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: MineralMan

To me, it sounds like the beast was naturally mummified after death, like the bodies we find in peat bogs today. Once mummified, the soft tissues would not decay like regular tissue and the process of fossilization of the mummified soft tissue would be possible. The mummification process would have given the fossilization qualities of bone to the soft tissue. This must be indeed a very rare find!


60 posted on 08/29/2006 2:09:58 PM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: MineralMan

Also, mummified hadrosaurs have been found before in North America, but none so well preserved as the Maltese specimen (a precious, jewel encrusted "Big Bird" instead of a black bird :))


67 posted on 08/31/2006 8:44:52 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Creationism is to conservatism what Howard Dean is to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson