Your post is inexplicable by short memory. Your earlier post to FareOpinion, Asking questions to rabid wanna-be pundits will get you bit, was directed toward FO in a post FO directed to me. Logically therefore, you were referring to me as a "rabid would be pundit."
That's name calling on your part by any objective standard. So either your "failing memory" includes the inability to chase down the sources for your own posts (see "incompetent"), or you are dishonestly portraying an indirect but very broad insult subjectively narrowly, which I charitably tend to assign to the latter.
So don't bother with the apology. Your stridency on this thread as a Maryland resident betrays an inordinate interest in this California bill, explainable only by delight in today's action by the Grovelnator which is certainly open for query.
Finally, my reference to incompetence was to FO, not necessarily you, although it definitely (and, given your posts on this thread, quite deliberately) left open that door. I don't know yet how clueless you are, but for the indication that you support this monstrous curse of a Republican governor, which is certainly an indication.
I read the first few sentences. You accept all the other questions/insults. I take it you don't have to work either.
Why would I apologize? The term rabid is mild.