Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Txsleuth
From the first week of October 2003, then, investigators knew who leaked Valerie Plame’s identity — the ostensible purpose of an investigation that still continues, a few months shy of three years after it began.

Maybe they would have known a bit earlier if they had talked with this guy:

SEPTEMBER 2003 : (RAY MCGOVERN OF VETERAN INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS FOR SANITY SAYS HE KNOWS WILSON'S WIFE VALERIE PLAME WAS A 'DEEP COVER OPERATIVE RUNNING A NETWORK OF INFORMANTS ON WMD') To: cyncooper Good thoughts. There's also the Ray McGovern angle...McGovern is quoted in September as saying he "knows Joe Wilson well enough to know that his wife was in fact a deep cover operative running a network of informants on [WMD]." McGovern founded "Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity", which vehemently opposed the war. - Source: Freeper Seamole?

136 posted on 08/28/2006 6:48:56 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts; Peach
ONE FRENZIED WEEK Given the most recent revelation about Armitage — no surprise to anyone watching the case — plus what was previously known about the leak, the question now is, why did the investigation go on? Why was it expanded, and why was Fitzgerald named, and why does it continue today? Some of the answers can be found in the events of a single, frenzied week at the end of September and beginning of October 2003.

It was a peculiar week:

SEPTEMBER 2003 late : (PUTIN : CRYPTIC COMMENTS ABOUT TALKS WITH SOMEONE / SOME GROUP / OR COUNTRY WHICH APPROACHED HIM ABOUT WANTING TO OPPOSE THE USA IN AFGHANISTAN)[FReeper comment:] May is also the time in which the questions, rumblings began about the guy, can't think of his name but quit his Wall Street job couple of weeks ago cause of his vast up front pension plan.
Now there is something else going on here beside this "WHO leaked a name", up to this point, Clarke going to save us from ourselves, Davis about to get his lights turned off are diversions for something else.
These people don't get this crazy unless they are trying to hide something and Putin's words over the weekend were very strange. Putin comes here a without explanation tells the world that he was talking turkey with some about opposing us in going into Afghanistan. What in the world was that all about? Whatever is going on this Wilson stuff is a diversion.
-------- 201 posted on 09/29/2003 3:12 PM PDT by Just mythoughts *
*
To: Just mythoughts : That's interesting to tie Putin's words to this and you could be right. The press must have hated it that Putin said if they hadn't joined the US in Afghanistan, there would have been a different outcome because he was approached by various countries(?), organizations(?) who wanted to fight against our soldiers there.
212 posted on 09/29/2003 3:16 PM PDT by Peach *
*
To: Peach : What was strange to me was why it was here and along side President Bush and no further explanation for his words. This leaves little doubt that President Bush knew about whom he was speaking. Now these people know very well that the whole world is watching and Putin could have very easily sent a letter or phone call letting those he referenced get the picture. One can with credibility make the claim that as leader of the free world the Clintons opposed removing terrorists.
------ 293 posted on 09/29/2003 3:44 PM PDT by Just mythoughts

145 posted on 08/28/2006 7:03:57 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson