Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
The "objective" papers certainly dominated in sheer subscriptions, but the sensationalist papers never went away.

In fact, that's pretty much what we're left with today isn't it; particularly "broadcast" journalism. Can you tie that in with the leftist agenda somehow? Or are they unrelated?

79 posted on 08/30/2006 5:58:54 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake

The partisan press took a vacation from 1865 to about 1960---but that's not to be confused with the "sensationalist" press, which never left. Now, PART of leftism is reporting the bad, namely the "progressive" notion that since the world isn't perfect, the status quo is always the enemy, so you must always report negative stuff. To from that perspective, sensationalism has always been leftist. I think the tendency toward "bad news" is progressive in nature; but when the bad news is accelerated and enhanced by partisan reporting, then it becomes the drive-by media.


80 posted on 08/30/2006 7:38:43 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson