Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quark2005
In essence, you're agreeing with me that the Theory of Evolution does have moral implications. And, when we're confronted with something like Social Darwinism, it's pretty obvious that "science" cannot provide a moral basis on which to decide on whether or not Social Darwinism (or, more to the point of this article, Nazi eugenics theory) is morally acceptable.
97 posted on 08/28/2006 7:52:53 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
And, when we're confronted with something like Social Darwinism, it's pretty obvious that "science" cannot provide a moral basis on which to decide on whether or not Social Darwinism (or, more to the point of this article, Nazi eugenics theory) is morally acceptable.

I completely agree with this statement. It's not the job of science to provide a moral basis, only to discover and interpret data.

Blaming the theory evolution for what Hitler did is like pushing your grandmother down the stairs and blaming the theory of gravitation. Just doesn't make any sense. Scientific observations don't validate anyone's bad behavior.

174 posted on 08/28/2006 9:09:32 AM PDT by Quark2005 ("Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs." -Matthew 7:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson