You're engaging in the historicism that was being mocked just upthread. Darwin apparently IS omnipresent and eternal, praise be! Either that, or you're seeking to diminish the importance of Darwin in authoring the theory of evolution, for the petty reason of covering for your own historical error.
I see that Newspeak continues to thrive in the Creationist community.
The only error was yours, and as I said before if you think that engaging in puerile semantic games will somehow cause people to overlook your series of factual errors, misstatements and flat-out ignorance, then you have a very low opinion of FReepers.
"The only error was yours, and as I said before if you think that engaging in puerile semantic games will somehow cause people to overlook your series of factual errors, misstatements and flat-out ignorance, then you have a very low opinion of FReepers."
Temper, temper. You're not above semantic games and misstatements, yourself. I won't stoop to calling you ignorant, though.