Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: L98Fiero
According to Darwin's theory, it is indeed possible, if not probable, for one race to be more "evolved" than others or different races to exist in varying degrees of "evoloution", much like many other species and sub-species around the world.

What do you mean by "more evolved"? What metric(s) is/are measured to determine the level at which an individual is "evolved"?
436 posted on 08/28/2006 3:04:23 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

"What do you mean by "more evolved"? What metric(s) is/are measured to determine the level at which an individual is "evolved"?"

Pick some metrics. It doesn't matter. If evoloution is real, the devil is in the details. If the theory holds, plants and animals should have evolved to suit their particular environments. Changing the environment of one group should put them at the disadvantage when placed in a different environment.

I probably should have been PC and said "evolved differently" but that's not what Darwin alluded to, even though I think that applies as well.

My point is, that it can't be ruled out as a possiblity, or even a probablity when scientifically addressing the theory of evoloution as it relates to man.

On a side note, it's interesting how plants are rarely, if ever, discussed when the subject of evoloution pops up. I'm still wondering how that sharp thorn came to be. ;)


447 posted on 08/28/2006 3:33:03 PM PDT by L98Fiero (Evil is an exact science)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson