"EternalVigilance claimed that the title of the book referred specifically to human races. It does not."
We've since established that the subtitle does not specifically exclude human races, either, so you're splitting hairs.
We've since established that the subtitle does not specifically exclude human races, either, so you're splitting hairs.
Nonsense. Human beings are not the subject of the book, as anyone who has actually read it can tell you.
Asking someone to prove a negative is another frequent strategy employed by creationists. This is a perfect example of it.
It is incument upon the person making a positive claim - that Darwin was talking about people - to substantiate it. You are trying to change the subject, which does not help the credibility of your argument.