Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio

"I only pointed out that "races" in the title of Darwin's first book does not specifically refer to human "races" and that it is dishonest to claim otherwise."

The word "specifically" was not in your initial response, which was to deny that the title referred to human races at all.


265 posted on 08/28/2006 11:23:17 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry; EternalVigilance

EternalVigilance claimed that the title of the book referred specifically to human races. It does not. Your continued statements on this subject do not change the fact that EternalVigilance was making a false claim.


270 posted on 08/28/2006 11:28:46 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry
The word "specifically" was not in your initial response, which was to deny that the title referred to human races at all.

The intent of my statement was to dispute the implication that the title of the book referred to human races. Your semantic arguments do not make EternalVigilance's claim correct.
285 posted on 08/28/2006 11:38:31 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson