To: Dimensio
"I only pointed out that "races" in the title of Darwin's first book does not specifically refer to human "races" and that it is dishonest to claim otherwise."
The word "specifically" was not in your initial response, which was to deny that the title referred to human races at all.
To: RegulatorCountry; EternalVigilance
EternalVigilance claimed that the title of the book referred specifically to human races. It does not. Your continued statements on this subject do not change the fact that EternalVigilance was making a false claim.
270 posted on
08/28/2006 11:28:46 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: RegulatorCountry
The word "specifically" was not in your initial response, which was to deny that the title referred to human races at all.
The intent of my statement was to dispute the implication that the title of the book referred to human races. Your semantic arguments do not make EternalVigilance's claim correct.
285 posted on
08/28/2006 11:38:31 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson