"They pay money for their air-time like everyone else. Perhaps you think they should not be allowed to speak? I haven't heard one word of refutation of what Kennedy says, only insults." ~ Dr. Thorne
I agree with you that they have a right to free speech as much as anyone else. They haven't advocated killing those who don't agree with them.
I would like to know, however, how you think Kennedy's statement, "To put it simply, no Darwin, no Hitler," is any different from saying:
"To put it simply, no Bible no David Duke? Or:
"To put it simply, no guns, no murders." ? Or:
"To put it simply, no writing implements, no misspelled words"? Or:
"To put it simply, no Bible no Inquisition or witch-burning"?
"To put it simply, no Bible no Inquisition or witch-burning?"
... or Hitler? There are self-styled defenders of Darwin on this thread who seem to be laboring under the impression that this is the far more rational and socially acceptable conclusion.