Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's Taliban strikes again
Arkansas News Bureau ^ | 28 August 2006 | John Brummett

Posted on 08/28/2006 6:31:13 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 701-713 next last
To: PatrickHenry

Get the evolutionists off of educational welfare...


61 posted on 08/28/2006 7:18:26 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
If there is a Taliban in America, it is the liberals and pseudo-conservatives who have a psuedo-religion, called secular humanism, which they fail to acknowledge. Through the ACLU, their dominance of the MSM and academia, they use the tactics of lawsuits, false reporting, hyperbole, and smears to suppress conservatives, especially those who draw their political beliefs from the Christian or Jewish religions. On FR, these secularist Taliban members may be found in the pro-evolution crowd and the RINOs who pretend to be conservatives, but are not.

A paragraph that bears repeating!

62 posted on 08/28/2006 7:19:23 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
I advocated killing no one.

Oh, please yourself - "removing someone from the gene pool" means one of two things. One, sterilization. Two, execution. Anyone who disagrees with you about equating Coral Ridge to the Taliban needs to be removed from the gene pool, you said, so were you advocating execution, or sterilization for those who disagree with you.

Spin all you like, but there your words are, in black and white. And I bet you're actually surprised when folks react badly, aren't you?

63 posted on 08/28/2006 7:19:31 AM PDT by Senator Bedfellow (If you're not sure, it was probably sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

""You can't equate a thinker and a madman, or science and crime."

It is wrong and very dangerous to dismiss people like Hitler (or Ahmedijad, or Kim Jong Il, etc.) as "madmen." These people are in fact "thinkers," even intellectuals of a sort. The problem is not that they are "crazy," but that they are evil. Their ideas didn't come out of psychotic delusions, but from the intellectual climate of their time. Racism, evolution, and eugenics were popular among intellectuals in the period when Hitler was cooking up his ideology. Not that Darwin was to blame for Hitler, but his ideas were influential.


64 posted on 08/28/2006 7:19:56 AM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
. . . needs to be immediately removed from the gene pool.

Which are you proposing, the "final solution" or just forced sterilization?

65 posted on 08/28/2006 7:20:07 AM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow

Your panties are on waaaaaaaaaayyyyyy too tight this morning.


66 posted on 08/28/2006 7:20:21 AM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

This is going to be an interesting thread.

One thing, I'm amused that so many people jump on the author for his hyperbolic comparison of Christians to the Talibs, but no one seems to recognize the absurdity of blaming the Holocaust on Charles Darwin. In this sense, I would have to say that the author's use of reductio was highly effective.

Secondly, I'm also amused that so few people criticize the producers of the video tape for their questionable practices. Dr. Francis Collins is the director of the Human Genome Project at the National Institute of Health. He is a highly respected molecular biologist and a Christian. He was interviewed by the producers of this video but they lied to him about their purpose. Dr. Collins has stated he believed he was being interviewed about a book he recently published, while in actuality he was being filmed for this production on creationism/intelligent design. The producers of this video tape then went on to advertise that Dr. Collins was going to appearing in it, thus lending his respectability to it.

Therefore, I believe those people who condemn the author of this article for his use of hyperbole yet at the same time praise the producer of the video despite his conduct are nothing but big, fat hypocrites.

Furthermore, I also believe that people who claim the Holocaust is a consequence of Charles Darwin are implicitly denying the influence of centuries of Christian anti-semitism. It is for this reason I believe people who make such claims are engaging in a mild form of Holocaust denial.


67 posted on 08/28/2006 7:20:33 AM PDT by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
I employed hyperbole to demonstrate the utter idiocy of the drivel you seem to accept at face value.

You're so full of it you're squeaking, pal. When you say something like that, it's "hyperbole". When someone else says that Coral Ridge is like the Taliban, it's obviously a comparison that must be taken entirely literally, with no room for literary devices like hyperbole. Nice double-standard.

68 posted on 08/28/2006 7:21:34 AM PDT by Senator Bedfellow (If you're not sure, it was probably sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Depends on the funding.


69 posted on 08/28/2006 7:21:43 AM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow
Nice double-standard.

Thanks! I try.

70 posted on 08/28/2006 7:22:17 AM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Your panties are on waaaaaaaaaayyyyyy too tight this morning.

Last I checked, "removing people from the gene pool" wasn't a conservative value or program. Are you sure you're in the right place? Stormfront is into that kind of thing - maybe you'd be happier there.

71 posted on 08/28/2006 7:22:42 AM PDT by Senator Bedfellow (If you're not sure, it was probably sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Coral Ridge espouses that America is not a free-religion nation, but a Christian one. It argues there should be no separation of church and state.

Thus it's America's Taliban, America's Shiite theocracy.

Whoa.  How'd he make the jump from premise A to conclusion B?

There's nothing funnier than when a dumbass writes an article about other dumbasses.

72 posted on 08/28/2006 7:22:49 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage

I'm superman by gettingaway with murder. And when get caught, I defend myself by blaming Nietzsche. After all, he influenced me. Even if I really was influenced by Nietzsche, does that let me off the hook?

According to this artricle, it does. It opens by saying that positing an influence from Darwin to Hitler frees Hitler of fault.

Then again, emotional impact always did make better eliminationist propaganda than reason, as you-know-who could attest.
//////////////////////
where this comes full circle is that the social darwinism/eugenics thinking of the right of the early 20th Century has migrated to the left. Designer babies for heteros and invitro for homos is the order of the day and for the future -- cloning.


73 posted on 08/28/2006 7:23:52 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: DoctorMichael

So, anyone that disagrees with your perception of intellectual perfection is lying or ignorant?

I'm not even sure where to start with such an arrogant generalization.


75 posted on 08/28/2006 7:26:47 AM PDT by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat [This is some nasty...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow

No, I don't want to forcibly remove people from the gene pool, silly. I just think it would be nice if blithering imbeciles who believe such idiocy would voluntarily stop breeding.

You know. Take one for the team.


76 posted on 08/28/2006 7:27:06 AM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Have you also been reminded many times that two plus two make four, and have you failed to learn that fact as well?

Two words, Steve: Social Darwinism.

The idea was inspired by the theory of evolution, as you well know. As were a whole host of other eugenic (and economic) theories.

I suppose you can ignore the fact that ideas -- even the theory of evolution -- have moral consequences. But of course, anything that has a practical application carries with it a set of moral implications. I rather doubt that you'd claim that evolutionary theory has no practical applications, which leaves you with the problem of dealing with its moral implications.

I'd wager that you are not in favor of Social Darwinism. But in order to be against it (or for it, for that matter), you must make the argument why evolutionary theory cannot (or can) be applied to humankind. The moral implications just sit there, unable to be ignored.

77 posted on 08/28/2006 7:27:41 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Jüdenrien placemark


78 posted on 08/28/2006 7:28:16 AM PDT by dread78645 (Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Dude, give it up. You didn't say they should remove themselves, you said they should be removed.

Be a man, for crying out loud - either stand by what you actually said, or admit you said something you didn't really mean, and get on with your life. But either way, quit trying to spin your way out of it. It just looks sillier by the minute.

79 posted on 08/28/2006 7:30:43 AM PDT by Senator Bedfellow (If you're not sure, it was probably sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
They should blame Martin Luther. He was one of the nastiest Jew haters there ever was.

It's true. He was.

This great hero of the Reformation changed the world as the consequence of simply believing the Gospel, where it concerned simple faith.

Unfortunately, for himself and for the world, he stopped short of believing the part about Israel.

Those who do so do so at great peril.

80 posted on 08/28/2006 7:31:29 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 701-713 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson