Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Denver DEA Rep: Don't Legalize It
The Daily Camera ^ | August 27, 2006

Posted on 08/28/2006 3:45:15 AM PDT by Wolfie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

1 posted on 08/28/2006 3:45:16 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PaxMacian; WindMinstrel; philman_36; headsonpikes; cryptical; vikzilla; Crotalus72901; Quick1; ...

Your tax dolars at work ping.


2 posted on 08/28/2006 4:05:08 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
DONT LEGALIZE IT!!!!


3 posted on 08/28/2006 4:05:36 AM PDT by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
It is quite normal for executive departments to work in the development of beneficial legislation. Happens all the time. I have done it myself.

So, you have any more reasons why you should be using dope in the workplace?

4 posted on 08/28/2006 4:53:17 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
To begin with, I DON'T smoke pot and have no dog in this fight.

Moreover, I am not advocating legalizing any kinds of drugs or decriminalizing them.

However, the following stats speak for themselves as to whether the "War on Drugs" has been effective.

While I don't do drugs, it is apparent that they continue to be plentiful and as I understand, the quantities continue to increase and the street price either is stable or even, has decreased.

Moreover, methinks the DEA Agent(s) doeth protest too much and may have job security in the back of their mind?

While there are many good conscientious Fed LEA types; many other, are more Gestapo-acting, over the top, self-serving hypocrites and when you factor in the wholly illogical and "legalized thievery" which allows confiscation of property, absent a person being convicted of a crime, I am very dubious as to the WOD's efficacy--not to mention the average cost of $33,000 per arrest--other than it being a "full-employment" act for many tens of thousands in Justice Dept/LEA/Judges/Court Appointed Lawyers/Prison Guards/Probation Officers/etc., etc., etc.

In addition, I don't think that $33,000 a year, includes the approximate cost of $30,000 a year it costs to incarcerate these low-level, non-dealing, drug offenders.

And while I don't have an easy answer, the WOD deserves more scrutiny and dialogue in order to find a more effective policy for this problem, which does not appear to be going away any time in the near future

DRUG WAR CLOCK:

http://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm

It is Mon Aug 28 2006

Money Spent on the War On Drugs this Year

Federal: $13,217,283,466
State: $20,289,411,887
Total: $33,507,351,567
The U.S. federal government spent over $19 billion dollars in 2003 on the War on Drugs, at a rate of about $600 per second.

The budget has since been increased by over a billion dollars. Source: Office of National Drug Control Policy

State and local governments spent at least another 30 billion. Source: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University: "Shoveling Up: The Impact of Substance Abuse on State Budgets," January, 2001. Arrests for drug law violations in 2006 are expected to exceed the 1,678,192 arrests of 2003.

Someone is arrested every 20 seconds.Source: Uniform Crime Reports, Federal Bureau of Investigation

People Arrested for Cannabis Law Offenses this Year:485,527

In 2002, 45.3 percent of the 1,538,813 total arrests for drug abuse violations were for marijuana -- a total of 697,082.

Of those, 613,986 people were arrested for marijuana possession alone.

This is a slight decrease from 2000, when a total of 734,497 Americans were arrested for marijuana offenses, of which 646,042 were for possession alone.

Source: Uniform Crime Reports, Federal Bureau of Investigation

People Incarcerated for Drug Law Offenses this Year:7,149

Since December 31, 1995, the U.S. prison population has grown an average of 43,266 inmates per year.

About 25 per cent are sentenced for drug law violations.

Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics

5 posted on 08/28/2006 4:56:13 AM PDT by seasoned traditionalist (ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS, BUT ALL TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY, ARE MUSLIMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seasoned traditionalist
While there are many good conscientious Fed LEA types; many other, are more Gestapo-acting, over the top, self-serving hypocrites and when you factor in the wholly illogical and "legalized thievery" which allows confiscation of property, absent a person being convicted of a crime, I am very dubious as to the WOD's efficacy--not to mention the average cost of $33,000 per arrest--other than it being a "full-employment" act for many tens of thousands in Justice Dept/LEA/Judges/Court Appointed Lawyers/Prison Guards/Probation Officers/etc., etc., etc.

And you think the DEA doth protest too much?

6 posted on 08/28/2006 5:02:09 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

So when are the Libertarians, drug addicts, drug pushers, and all like minded people going to buy some land and start your own country? You're so much smarter, and presumably wealthier than the rest of us, and think of all the money you would save on law enforcement and incarceration.


7 posted on 08/28/2006 5:06:51 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

It seems to me that decriminalizing possession of an ounce of pot would free up limited Federal assets to focus on the key supply nodes that are providing the bales and kilos those ounces come out of.
Of course doing that would drive down the potential number of arrests for the DEA to make, which could be a problem come annual budget time. Maybe they could revise their budget pitch to emphasize quantities seized and the IMPORTANCE of individuals arrested.


8 posted on 08/28/2006 5:12:04 AM PDT by MadJack ("To the best of my recollection, senator, I don't remember.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
While there are many good conscientious Fed LEA types; many other, are more Gestapo-acting, over the top, self-serving hypocrites and when you factor in the wholly illogical and "legalized thievery" which allows confiscation of property, absent a person being convicted of a crime, I am very dubious as to the WOD's efficacy--not to mention the average cost of $33,000 per arrest--other than it being a "full-employment" act for many tens of thousands in Justice Dept/LEA/Judges/Court Appointed Lawyers/Prison Guards/Probation Officers/etc., etc., etc.

And you think the DEA doth protest too much

I was trying to make a point.

So WHAT'S YOURS?

Hire more LEA? Increase budget by $BILIONS and $BILIONS?

Build more prisons?

Make criminals out of millions more citizens?

Lock them all up and throw away the keys?

No, I don't have all (or even some) of the answers

Do YOU?????

9 posted on 08/28/2006 5:16:41 AM PDT by seasoned traditionalist (ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS, BUT ALL TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY, ARE MUSLIMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

This is an issue for the people of Colorado.

Why is the Bush administration,
pissing people off and losing votes?


10 posted on 08/28/2006 5:46:23 AM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Wolfie
Denver DEA Rep: Don't Legalize It

Don't legalize it and take away our livelihood.
12 posted on 08/28/2006 5:56:05 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
You're so much smarter, and presumably wealthier than the rest of us, and think of all the money you would save on law enforcement and incarceration.

And those who don't learn from history, such as yourself, are doomed to repeat it.
13 posted on 08/28/2006 5:58:06 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
So when are the Libertarians, drug addicts, drug pushers, and all like minded people going to buy some land and start your own country? You're so much smarter, and presumably wealthier than the rest of us, and think of all the money you would save on law enforcement and incarceration.

Perhaps it would be better if the Talibornagains would go off and form your own country. We'll give you Idaho if you like.

14 posted on 08/28/2006 6:07:51 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Not all government employees are parasites - in a well-ordered civic ecology, predators and scavengers form a key part of the Great Circle of Government.

Thus, we have the DEA agent.


15 posted on 08/28/2006 6:20:38 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: seasoned traditionalist

My issue with this is the same as the opponents of the DEA.
I personally don't even drink, let alone smoke dope. But legalization does seem to make sense.
Compare it to alcohol. When is the last time you heard of someone getting high and beating their wife? Stoners seem to mostly lay around playing Xbox games and eating day old pizza.

But, to the main point, I agree. It is outside the realm of the fed or any gov agency or it's employees to sponsor one side of a bill or the other, even though it happens all the time. There are advocacy groups on both sides of this issue, and if the DEA wishes to support the opposition, he can do it after he clocks out in his/her own personal life.
If the public wishes to leverage the "expert advice" of the DEA, I am sure they will ask. If the public wishes to blindly vote for things without researching it, that is also unfortunately within their rights (This is how liberals get elected).
Lets compare: How would people react if the Attorney general founded a no-prayer-allowed-in-school (call it whatever you like) organization on the clock, printed flyers, recruited supporters, all that guff even IF the entire thing was funded with "private" donations? Then, he/she started showing up in the newspapers like this speaking out and supporting the cause in public?
Exactly. These are public servants who are by design supposed to remain neutral in these issues. Failure to comply with this basic ethical standard undermines fairness and equality of all opinions, even if my opinions are the only ones that are always correct . hehehe


17 posted on 08/28/2006 6:37:32 AM PDT by FunkyZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
So when are the Libertarians, --- and all like minded people going to buy some land and start your own country?

Moony, -- we rational people did just that, - way back in 1776.

You're so much smarter, and presumably wealthier than the rest of us,

Poor little moonman displays his pique.

and think of all the money you would save on law enforcement and incarceration.

You bet. Unreasonable taxation sparked our '76 revolution. -- It could bring on the next one.

18 posted on 08/28/2006 7:22:59 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
The United States wasn't purchased. It was never Libertarian, and the Confederation didn't last very long.

BTW, whatever happened to the free state project? Another Libertarian failure?

19 posted on 08/28/2006 7:32:50 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
So when are the Libertarians, --- and all like minded people going to buy some land and start your own country?

Moony, -- we rational people did just that, - way back in 1776, with our blood & sweat .

The United States wasn't purchased. It was never Libertarian, and the Confederation didn't last very long.
BTW, whatever happened to the free state project? Another Libertarian failure?

You're obviously obsessed with libertarians, moony.. - Do you have an actual point, or is this just more pique?

20 posted on 08/28/2006 7:56:48 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson