Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expatpat

Hannibal made a major error in not going for a direct attack and taking the gamble.


10 posted on 08/27/2006 7:45:52 PM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: John Will

Could be, but didn't he need to pick up mercenaries in what is now Provence, on the way?


12 posted on 08/27/2006 7:55:42 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: John Will
Hannibal made a major error in not going for a direct attack and taking the gamble.

Read about the struggle to take Monte Cassino in WWII and you would know why no leader until Churchill was dumb enough to try a southern attack on Rome. I'm a Churchill fan, but there was no 'weak underbelly'. Just a few division of troops could hold back whole armies. The terrain is difficult for infantry and you can forgot siege machines (or even elephants.) The 'direct attack' was suicide. Ask any of the 250,000 troops who died there in 1943-1944.
18 posted on 08/28/2006 3:11:43 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool ("O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends" - Koran 5.51)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson