Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thumper1960
No other religion dictates that non-adherents be given the choice of conversion to it, or slavery by the adherents of it, or death for refusal to convert.

This view is not shared by all. Once again, I bring up one of the founders of modern radical Islam - Sayyid Qutb. I have never read any of his documents; I have read a historian's account of his documents. Mr. Qutb supported jihad in order to preserve Islam as a choice. He didn't care if people didn't convert; he just wanted them to be aware of the existence of the message.

Do you feel that all radical elements of religion must be excised with prejudice and absolutely terminated? What about Kahane?

426 posted on 08/28/2006 6:37:33 PM PDT by Abd al-Rahiim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies ]


To: Abd al-Rahiim
Radical elements whose stated purpose is to subjugate, by force, if needed, (as according to their tenets) so-called "non-believers". You know that as well as I do. Don't pretend to be unaware.

Kahane is dead, BTW.

428 posted on 08/29/2006 6:04:00 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson