To: All
And she's the National Review Editor??? We're losing in Iraq? Really? Is that why TENS OF THOUSANDS of soldiers and Marines are volunteering to go back multiple times? Is that why the Marines and Army have exceeded their recruiting goals already? Is that why the troops coming home ALWAYS tell a different story about Iraq than the media? Iraq is going well and I'll believe my military friends who have actually been in Iraq fighting, before I'll believe the media, who rarely ever leave their hotels, thank you very much. If guys like Novak were in charge decades ago, the world would have been in a bigger mess right now because Germany and Japan wouldn't even be Democracies.
151 posted on
08/27/2006 7:41:40 AM PDT by
TexasPatriot8
(Irrational is the person who is offended by the mention of a God that he doesn't believe exists.)
To: TexasPatriot8
And she's the National Review Editor??? We're losing in Iraq?
We have all ready won in Iraq. The question is will we let the Democrats take control of the Congress this November and hand the terrorists and their rouge state sponsors, Iran and Syria, the fruits of that victory? Look at the raw data. Same steady low level violence for three years. That is the sign of an "insurgency" that cannot evolve or grow. They are stuck in stage 1 guerrilla warfare. They can kill people and cause pain, they cannot evolve. Meanwhile the Counter Insurgency political structure is rapidly growing. The terrorists can continue to kill but they cannot win. The raw data below shows the utterly LIE in the DNC directed Junk Media spin lie about "Iraq on the verge of a civil war".
http://icasualties.org/oif/
http://icasualties.org/oif/IraqiDeaths.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_Security_Forces
215 posted on
08/27/2006 8:43:21 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
( Elections are more important then the feelings of the POS Cons (Perpetually Offended Syndrome))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson