You bring up all of the citizen sponsored initiatives (slot machines, bullet train, class size) and say that "Crist advocated for it." Are you implying that by filing briefs in front of the Florida Supreme Court in his capacity as the state's attorney general that he "advocated for it?" That's the only way that your above post could possibly make any sense. He did NOT support those amendments, and if you disagree, please post a link.
By the way, are you still insisting that Crist is pro gay adoption, even after he has said he opposes gay adoption? Finally, I have no idea what this $5k for adopted kids is all about. If you have any details about it, please share them. Otherwise, relax, I'm sure it's not a tax increase. If it were, the Gallagher campaign would be blasting him for it. (which they are not)
You're either the most uninformed poster on this board or an out and out liar. Based on your refusal to accept cold hard facts when presented with them as well as the distortions you've put forth on board, even after being refuted it's clear to me that you're the latter as opposed to the former. Not surprising for Team Crist.
I'm saying he supports the initiaves because "he advocated for them in his capacity as Attorney General."
No you nitwit. I'm saying he supports those initiatives because he said so during the debates.
"He's never supported gay adoption. He's come out against it."
Really????? Wrong again. In a recent radio interview he said he's "fine with it." Google it!
Don't know what I'm talking about when I refer to the 5K per couple per child PER YEAR?? He never said it because Team Gallagher would "be blasting him for it????"
Guess you weren't watching the debate. I think there's a rerun on tonight. You might want to watch it and see just what kind of puke you're supporting. Just one word of advice. Bring lots of kleenex. Your candidate won't be the only one sniveling (or do you again not know what I'm referring to because "Team Gallagher" didn't make hey of that either)?
Note to other Freepers: Isn't it amazing how thoroughly inept these trial lawyers, who are away all week and spend their Sundays fielding for their trial lawyer candidate on the boards, are at making a coherent argument.